- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -
Recommended Reading: Starr and Rehavi on Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process
Posted By Danielle Citron On November 16, 2012 @ 9:22 am In Bright Ideas,Criminal Law,Criminal Procedure | No Comments
Professor Sonja B. Starr  and Professor M. Marit Rehavi  have posted a fascinating new study on SSRN entitled Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker . It presents new empirical research on the effects of United States v. Booker on racial disparity in the federal criminal justice system (including in prosecutorial decision-making). The study challenges current thinking, finding that Booker has reduced –rather than exacerbated — racial disparity. Professor Starr, my brilliant former colleague and faculty member of the University of Michigan Law School, presented this research in August at the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference and in October at the National Sentencing Policy Institute, another federal judicial conference that also includes the US Sentencing Commission.
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/11/recommended-reading-starr-and-rehavi-on-racial-disparity-in-the-criminal-justice-process.html
URLs in this post:
 Professor Sonja B. Starr: http://web.law.umich.edu/_facultybiopage/facultybiopagenew.asp?ID=459
 Professor M. Marit Rehavi: http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/mrehavi/index.htm
 Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2170148
Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.