Site Meter

Clinton or Gillibrand for SCOTUS

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Brett Bellmore says:

    While I suppose it’s not technically a legal obstacle, Supreme Court justices don’t have to be lawyers, but you really think the President should spend political capital nominating a disbarred lawyer?

  2. Joe says:

    Gillibrand has turned out to be a fine choice for senator but especially after just winning her first full term, I see little reason she would be a logical choice for court of appeals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image