Clinton or Gillibrand for SCOTUS

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Brett Bellmore says:

    While I suppose it’s not technically a legal obstacle, Supreme Court justices don’t have to be lawyers, but you really think the President should spend political capital nominating a disbarred lawyer?

  2. Joe says:

    Gillibrand has turned out to be a fine choice for senator but especially after just winning her first full term, I see little reason she would be a logical choice for court of appeals.