Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Most under-appreciated thing about Warren Buffett: he built Berkshire to last well beyond him.  (LAC, at BRK annual meeting via Motley Fool, here.)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Kyle on Contract Evolution

    • Bruce Boyden on Tumblr, Porn, and Internet Intermediaries

    • Orin Kerr on The Varying Use of Legal Scholarship by the U.S. Supreme Court across Issues

    • Guy Spier on Symposium Redux: Essays and Lessons

    • John Mihaljevic on Is Berkshire Hathaway Really a Psychology Experiment?

    • Sy Lorne on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Skeptical Principal

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Berkshire's Dividend Policy: Part II

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Deals without Bankers: Salomon and Benjamin Moore

    • Brett Bellmore on National Referenda

    • Gerard Magliocca on National Referenda

    • mls on National Referenda

    • David Schwartz on The Varying Use of Legal Scholarship by the U.S. Supreme Court across Issues

    • Patrick S. O'Donnell on Warren Buffett: Practical Philosopher of Capitalism
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Overlong Resumes, Redux: What Would Alex Kozinski Do?

posted by Kyle Graham

By way of seconding Gerard’s comments regarding resume (and CV) creep and its baneful effects, let me share with you the rather short resume of an incredibly well-accomplished person: Alex Kozinski, circa 1984, as he was applying for a position on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Note that Judge Kozinski’s resume back then (as taken from the files of the Reagan Library) was all of two pages long, and that he didn’t go on and on explaining precisely what he did as a clerk for Chief Justice Burger, Judge Kennedy, or even as a judge on the Court of Claims. He didn’t even mention that he was once a contestant on “The Dating Game.”

Given that it’s interviewing season, this also might provide a good opportunity for me to offer a couple of resume tips to law students. I enjoy reviewing students’ resumes, and see a number of recurring errors along with what I consider to be poor judgment calls. I’ll offer a few suggestions, for what they’re worth, after the jump.

1) Know your degree. You’re paying $200,000 for a “juris doctor,” not a “juris doctorate.”

2) Appreciate the difference between a hyphen and an en-dash. En-dashes are wider than hyphens but shorter than em-dashes; they typically are used to signify spans of time, so that you should use them, and not hyphens, in describing how long you worked in a particular position.

3) Keep your formatting consistent across entries. This is probably the most common flat-out mistake that I see. Students often shift formatting several times across a resume, which makes their presentation seem sloppy. Commonly, for example, when listing the dates in which they held past positions, students shift from a space/en-dash/space format between the beginning and end dates (i.e., June 2007 — July 2008) to a no-space/en-dash/space format for other entries, to a no-space/hyphen/space format . . . you get the idea. This doesn’t seem like a big deal, but it will be, to at least one of your interviewers. A similar problem: switching back and forth between using the Oxford comma, and rejecting it.

4) Don’t sell yourself short. One student I recently advised had been told by someone else not to include on his resume a pre-law school job in which he built up a high-end, multinational, deep-sea fishing business from scratch. I thought that this advice was, in a word, insane. Of course most legal employers would be impressed that this student developed translatable talents such as managing demanding clients, handling  complex regulatory and business-planning issues, etc.

The larger point here is this: Just because a job isn’t “legal” doesn’t mean that it can’t bespeak your positive qualities. For example, if you worked at your University’s library, shelving books, for all four years of college, that might show prospective employers that you can stay with a dull job longer than other applicants might.

Plus, the lawyers with whom you’ll interview don’t always like asking about an interviewee’s prior law jobs. “How did you like it there?” and “What types of work did you do there?” are both dull questions to answer, and to ask.  If you have two prior jobs on your resume, one of which involved you working as a paralegal, and the other as a scooper at a Baskin-Robbins, 93 percent of attorneys with whom you interview are going to ask you about ice cream.  Trust me, it’s true. And if you anticipate this question, it’ll be a softball you can knock out of the park with a great story about your job–putting your oral communications skills (and enthusiasm) on display.

Of course, after a point, there’s an opportunity cost to each additional entry. (I am a strong believer in the one-page resume for most law students.)  But until you get there, err on the side of more, rather than less. If space is an issue, I would absolutely jettison extraneous, fourth or fifth bullet points for a particular law job that relate *meh* experience (here, I’m looking in your general direction, “[bullet] Observed court hearings”) in favor of adding an entry for an interesting, non-law job.  Also (see below), switching formats to a more narrative style can save space. Finally, appreciate that even if your resume relies mostly on 11 pt or 11.5 pt font, you can drop down to 8 pt or 9 pt for the spaces between entries, without it making your resume look squirrelly.

A related point: appreciate that in an interview, you’re looking for opportunities to engage in a pleasant, interesting conversation with the interviewer. Toward this purpose, more detail, rather than less, is also advisable (for the most part) for one’s descriptions of prior legal jobs. Many student resumes simply relate that in their most recent law job, the student “wrote legal memoranda and prepared drafts of court documents for (firm, agency, department) attorneys.” Yawn. Double yawn. What types of memoranda? On what areas of law? And what sorts of court documents? Wrestling with what kinds of issues? What were the results for your clients? These sorts of details give interviewers something to sink their teeth into, so that they can ask you more-specific questions that, again, you can better anticipate and use as a launching pad for a nice chat.

(One caveat: If you have any concerns about the sensitivity of this information, make sure to check with your prior employer, so that you don’t divulge client confidences. I’m not saying you should relate within your resume the guts of that memo on whether your client violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.)

5) Reconsider whether to use bullet points. Bullet points in a resume present some tricky issues. On the one hand, they’re common, and offer a simple way to communicate a lot of information. On the other, I often spot parallelism problems across bullet points, they place a lot of strain on resume writers to come up with different verbs that say basically the same thing, they create a lot of useless white space on a resume (some white space = good; lots of white space = bad), and, most important of all, they normally don’t put your (good) writing skills on display.

A resume is a writing sample. And what’s more, most readers come to resumes with pretty low expectations. If you can demonstrate your writing skills in the course of a one-page resume, you’ve distanced yourself from eighty percent of the pack. This intuition leads me to prefer resumes in which, for each past position, the writer relates in narrative form what he or she did in that job, in an appropriate level of detail (see above), instead of relying upon bullet points.  One distinct advantage of this approach is that it accommodates an opening blurb in which the applicant explains what the heck the company or organization that he or she worked for actually does (e.g., “Responsibilities on behalf of a leading construction-law  firm included . . . “). With bullet points, either the reader is forced to guess what type of law is practiced by the firm of Dewey, Cheatem & Howe, or the writer has to create a parallelism problem within their bullets. A narrative approach also accommodates a little more bounded creativity in describing one’s prior positions and accomplishments.

6) “Additional Information.” Consider grouping your odd and awesome stuff in an “Additional Information” section at the bottom of your resume. If you have a prior job that (notwithstanding the advice above) you have some misgivings about placing on an equal plane with your earlier law-job positions or other core experience, remember that you can always put your two years working retail at a magic store in the mall at the bottom of your resume, along with your interests (backpacking, photography, etc.) and talents (spoken or computer languages, etc.).

One advantage of this approach is that it’s a space-saver; you don’t have to have several separate lines for each entry in this section. “Additional Information” is also the perfect spot to place something that reflects well on you, but can’t be shoehorned into your Education or Experience sections — e.g., community service, leadership positions, your title as Southern California Disco Competition Champion (2011), etc. Again, don’t be shy, but don’t be frivolous. (I’m not a fan of people who list “drinking beer” as one of their “hobbies.”) To repeat what I said earlier, you are looking for opportunities to put one of your positive, relevant qualities on display, and one way to do that is to tee up a great story about how you won the competition even though your sequined vest ripped during the opening bars of “Boogie Shoes.”

Good luck!


 September 1, 2012 at 8:48 pm   Posted in: Education, Teaching   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Paul Gowder - September 1, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    I really hope that employers aren’t judging students on the details of typography to the point of inspecting their en-dashes…

  2. Kevin Jon Heller - September 1, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    Your advice is great, but your reference to Kozinski is just silly. Do you really think that the committee making decisions about judicial candidates recommended him based solely his CV? I’m pretty sure most employers, including law school hiring committees, don’t have legions of people examining the backgrounds of their candidates.

  3. Kyle Graham - September 1, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    Kevin: I am guilty as charged of using a very, very small aperture as an excuse to post the Kozinski resume. Happily, I take “just silly” as a high compliment.

  4. bill reynolds - September 2, 2012 at 12:02 pm

    You left out the most important point: How did he do on The Dating Game?

  5. Kyle Graham - September 2, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    Bill: See for yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdjCdbGucCU

  6. bill reynolds - September 2, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    Thanks. So he’s just not another pretty face

  7. Jordan J. Paust - September 4, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    I once had a student who came to me somewhat distraught — he was only in the middle of his class, how could he get a job? I asked if he did well in any particular area or cluster of courses and seminars. “Yes,” he replied, in the business area. I told him that he should mention such in his resume — under J.D. at U of H. he did, and as I recall, he was hired partly because of his accomplishments in the business area.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress