Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Cardozo Law School's Susan Crawford battles telecom giants, per NYT here.  (LAC)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Matt on Warren Buffett: Practical Philosopher of Capitalism

    • Personal Injury Lawyer on Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • Guy Spier on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • John Mihaljevic on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • Kal on Towards Responsible Use of Cognition-Dulling Drugs

    • anon on The Pervasive Role of Priors: Part One

    • Joe on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • mls on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Legal Peer Review Journals: Time to Reject/Accept/R&R?

posted by Dave Hoffman

One of the advantages of student-edited law journals is that the turn-around time for acceptance or rejection is typically relatively fast – if you are going to hear, you’ll know within a month or two 95% of the time.  The same can’t be said for peer review journals in other fields, which are famously very, very slow.

What about peer reviewed journals that focus on law, and which regularly publish the writings of American law professors?  After the jump, I’ve listed the the top fifty peer and referreed journals, by combined impact factor (W&L) rank.  I’d be curious to hear from readers who’ve submitted to these journals regarding how long it took to get a substantive response (whether acceptance, rejection, or R&R). I’ll participate in the comment thread if others do – I’ve submitted to JLS, JELS, and JLEO, and JLA, and have generally positive views about those journals’ ability to get back with some answer in a reasonable amount of time.

1 Supreme Court Review
2 Journal of Legal Analysis (2009-)
3 Supreme Court Economic Review
4 The Journal of Legal Studies
5 Cato Supreme Court Review
6 American Business Law Journal
7 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2004-)
8 Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
9 Journal of Tort Law (2006-)[online]
10 The American Journal of Comparative Law
11 Journal of National Security Law & Policy (2005-)
12 Tax Law Review
13 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (Israel)
14 Constitutional Commentary
15 Law and Contemporary Problems
16 The American Bankruptcy Law Journal
17 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (2003-)
18 The Federal Courts Law Review
19 Clinical Law Review
20 Air Force Law Review
20 American Journal of International Law
22 American Journal of Law & Medicine
22 Antitrust Law Journal
24 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2005-)
25 Law & Social Inquiry
26 The Business Lawyer
26 The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization
28 Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal
29 Florida Tax Review
30 AIPLA Quarterly Journal
30 Pace Environmental Law Review
32 European Journal of International law (United Kingdom)
33 American Law and Economics Review
34 Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy
34 Jurimetrics The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology
34 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
37 Family Law Quarterly
38 New Criminal Law Review
38 Pittsburgh Tax Review (2003-)
40 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal
40 Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal
40 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
40 International Journal of Constitutional Law (2003-) (United Kingdom)
44 Law & Society Review
45 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal
46 Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2005-) (United Kingdom)
46 University of Toronto Law Journal (Canada)
48 Food and Drug Law Journal
49 University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy
50 University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal (2003-) (Canada)


 September 6, 2012 at 5:52 pm   Posted in: Law School (Law Reviews), Law School (Scholarship)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (6)

  1. I. Glenn Cohen - September 7, 2012 at 10:27 am

    I have received amazingly fast turn around from the Journal of Legal Analysis the two times I have submitted, less than a month, including detailed reviewer comments in the latter case that generated a conditional acceptance.

  2. Dave Hoffman - September 7, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Thanks for starting us off!

    I also have gotten very quick turnaround from JLA (n=1). Less than a month, albiet for a very kind “no fit” rejection.

    JLS: Around 2-3 months, with truly amazing reviews (rejection, but the kind that makes the paper better)

    JLEO: 3 months, as I recall, again with tremendous reviews (acceptance, at last).

    JELS: The timing has varied. Three submissions: one was R&R’d at 3 months; one was rejected at 6 months; one is pending at 3 months.

  3. Matt - September 7, 2012 at 11:13 am

    I haven’t submitted to any of these, or refereed for them, but have submitted twice to _Law & Philosophy_. The first time I got an R&R in about two months and then an acceptance in about a month after I re-submitted, and the second time an acceptance w/in about two months. I have also refereed for Law & Philosophy and was asked to do my review w/in a month. I’m pretty sure I did that. I’ve also reviewed for _Criminal Law & Philosophy_ twice and was asked for a review in a month, and did that. Both _Law & Philosophy_ and _Criminal Law & Philosophy_ seem to me to run pretty tight ships. (I’ve also reviewed for the University of Chicago Law Review, and was asked for a report in one week. That’s hard, if you want to write an actual report.)

    My impression is that, in many cases, a significant portion of the delay in peer reviewing comes from difficulty in finding referees, though of course there are other reasons, too.

  4. Anon - September 7, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    Delays can be pretty bad with many of the law and economics journals. Here are my experiences with seven submissions.

    Acceptances:

    JLE: first round 5 months, second round 11 months, third round 1 month
    JLEO: first round 7 months, second round 6 months, third round 3 months
    JLS: first round 7 months, second round 5 months
    JELS: first round 3 months (accepted subject to minor revisions)

    Rejections:

    JLEO: 6 months
    JLS: 2 months; 5 months

    The quality of the reviews varied a lot. In one case, the reviews were extremely helpful and definitely improved the paper. Most of the reviews were at best marginally helpful, and some were completely worthless.

    In four of the cases, the editor followed the recommendation of the referees; in three cases, the editor overruled the referee. For the papers that were accepted, the editors also made constructive suggestions that improved the papers.

  5. Anon - September 8, 2012 at 10:02 am

    I’ve submitted several papers to the American Business Law Journal, and typically hear back within 6 weeks.

  6. Comparative Law Rookie - September 21, 2012 at 6:42 pm

    Does anyone have information to share about the American Journal of Comparative Law? What is their review process like?

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress