Site Meter

The Best (Modern) Contracts Cases

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. David R. Maass says:

    I’m only a student, but when I was taking contracts I came across this news story and I had to send it to my professor. It raises issues about offers and unilateral contracts.

    http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/bizarre&id=7693065

  2. Joe Shenkman says:

    I’d recommend also looking beyond the US. English, Australian, Canadian, Singaporean, and New Zealand courts have had excellent contracts jurists in recent years, and consequently the opinions tend to be very high-quality.

    I’d particularly recommend:

    - Gay v Loh (Consideration – Singapore, Phang JA)
    - Great Peace v Tsavliris (Mistake – England)
    - Hudson v Shogun Finance (Mistake – England)
    - Supershield v Siemens (Damages – England)
    - The Heron II (Damages – England)
    - Investors’ Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society (Construction of terms – England) and Chartbrook v Persimmon (same)
    - Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom (Implied terms – England or Privy Council [can't remember which])
    - RTS v Muller (Intention to create legal relations/’subject to contract’ – England)
    - Asia Pacific Breweries v SEB (Agency – Singapore) (best read along with The Ocean Frost [Agency - England] and First Energy v Hungarian International Bank [Agency – England)

    I’d also recommend that Trusts and Remedies profs consider using English and Australian cases, particularly on Tracing and Restitution. Some interesting ones include:
    - Foskett v McKeown (Tracing – England)
    - Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC (Constructive Trusts & Unjust Enrichment – England)
    - Pitt v Holt (Mistake – England)
    - Bristol & West Building Society v Motthew (Fiduciary duties – England)
    - Attorney-General v Blake (Restitutionary damages – England)
    - Royal Brunei Airways v Tan (Accessory liability – Privy Council)
    - Twinsectra v Yardley (‘Quistclose’ trusts, accessory liability – England)
    - Barlow Clowes v Eurotrust (Accessory liability – Privy Council)
    - BCCI v Akindele (Accessory liability – England)

    There is also a wealth of English & Commonwealth commentary on private law subjects that is well worth reading for US lawprofs, since they often deal with similar issues. Checking the Law Quarterly Review, Modern Law Review, Legal Studies, Cambridge Law Journal and Oxford Journal of Legal Studies can often help US law research.

    It is too rare nowadays for common law countries to look at each other’s law. I think it would really help students critically analyze issues in the law if they were instructed to look more often at other common law solutions to similar problems.

  3. Miriam A. Cherry says:

    @David: I had seen the tattoo on the forehead guy before. Interesting…
    @Dave: Yes, that case is in the Barnett book, no?
    @Joe: Thanks for the international perspective. I’ll have to check these out!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image