Site Meter

A Judicial Coup?

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Recent developments in Egypt are quite disconcerting. It seems the revolutionary period is in abeyance. It is interesting to look back at the debates about the existing and possible future role for the military several months ago: some cautioning us not to take them at their word, that they were determined not to surrender power, etc.; others claiming they would cede to the “people’s wishes,” could live with a democracy, and so on. I was inclined, given their behavior during the Tahrir Square protests, to believe the latter argument: it seems all-to-clear that I was naively mistaken! Events in Egypt have and will continue to have, ripple effects and other important consequences throughout the Arab (and some of the Islamic) world. I think all of us should be paying very close attention.

  2. Henry McGee says:

    Professor Mahmud’s insights confirm the hunches of observors of the situation in Egypt by others less familiar with the evolving situation than is he.

  3. A.J. Sutter says:

    1. Unfortunately, it’s not only the Global South that suffers from this problem; while we don’t yet have any praetorian usurpers, the justices of the Supreme Court of Japan too have often been “instruments to thwart democratic aspirations [rather] than protectors of constitutional and human rights.” See, e.g., Shigeo Matsui’s recent monograph on Japan’s constitution.

    2. Listening to the voices on the news of Egyptian women who voted against the Muslim Brotherhood candidate Morsi, I have to wonder if the word “democratic” is used a bit too generously in this post. That democracy is more than elections may be an old saw, but it’s nonetheless a good saw. I’m highly skeptical, to put it mildly, that basing policy on religious orthodoxy can ever be democratic (no free pass for Israel on this, either). The past two Egyptian elections may indicate that what TV portrayed as the relatively non-religious nature of the Tahrir Square protests wasn’t representative of the majority of the electorate. But democracy isn’t so simple as majority rule, in any case.

  4. John McKay says:

    An excellent, though sad commentary on the misuse of judicial authority, or perhaps more accurately the failure of judicial independence. Left unsaid is the role of other governments who may or may not sanction such undemocratic gestures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image