A Nice Test of the Calder “Exception” to McIntyre v. Nicastro
posted by Dave Hoffman
In last year’s McIntyre v. Nicastro, Justice Kennedy, writing for four Justices, emphasized that personal jurisdiction rested on purposeful availment of the forum state. But, he quickly qualified, “in some cases, as with an intentional tort, the defendant might well fall within the State’s authority by reason of his attempt to obstruct its laws.” As many have noted, this leaves the Calder v. Jones libel jurisdiction line of cases up in the air. Do they remain good law? Would it matter if the libel happened only over the ‘net?
I guess we’ll see. Read the complaint in O’Keefe v. Current Media. It’s a good example of what’s coming — a news report delivered mostly on the web, which happened to reach New Jersey, where the plaintiff now seeks redress in State Court for libel. Does New Jersey have jurisdiction over Current Media, Keith Olberman, and David Shuster? Only Justices Breyer and Alito know.