Site Meter

Today’s 5 New Supreme Court Opinions

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Jarod Bona says:

    For whatever it is worth, I am very appreciative of these quick morning summaries of new Supreme Court cases. You provide just enough information to help me decide which ones to print out to read.

  2. Josh Blackman says:

    Glad I could be of service!

  3. Jordan J. Paust says:

    Bond v. U.S. — later, on the merits, the treaty power must necessarily trump state power in view of the fact that the treaty power is expressly delegated to the federal government and is also expressly denied to the states — either one of which obviates the 10th Amend. vis a vis the treaty power. See free download of article (31 Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. 301, 318-24 (2008) at
    Next, Congress has the power to implement treaty-based and customary international law for criminal sanction purposes — see, e.g., U.S. v. Arjona, U.S. v. Haun, Missouri v. Holland, etc., addressed in casebook International Law and Litigation in the U.S. 251-72 (3 ed. 2009) (West, American Casebook Series).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image