Site Meter

Wal-Mart and the Future of Antidiscrimination Law

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. Ken Rhodes says:

    “The issue before the Court is one that civil procedure, specifically class action, junkies should find titillating.”

    Well, I’m not a lawyer, let alone a civil procedure junkie. However, it appears to these non-attorney eyes that this case is VASTLY important, and interesting, in the same way that many Supreme Court cases are.

    The Supremes don’t overturn a murder conviction because they decide the defendant wasn’t really guilty. They overturn it when the process wasn’t proper. That seems pretty important, and far reaching, and interesting, to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image