A Chauffeur’s Dilemma for Wisconsin’s Police
posted by Frank Pasquale
Kevin Drum has explained events in Wisconsin well. Whatever you think of public sector unions, Gov. Walker’s proposals ring alarm bells because they are so high-handed. They are also embedded in a larger package of crony capitalism, authority for infrastructure giveaways, and Medicaid-mongering.
What’s particularly striking about Walker’s proposal is that it carves out favors for certain public sector unions which supported his election, including the police. These same unions may need to decide whether, in the event of continuing protests, to forcibly remove “agitators” and round up Democratic state senators. At that point, they might face what Arlie Hochschild has memorably styled “the Chauffeur’s Dilemma:”
Let’s consider our political moment through a story. Suppose a chauffeur drives a sleek limousine through the streets of New York, a millionaire in the backseat. Through the window, the millionaire spots a homeless woman and her two children huddling in the cold, sharing a loaf of bread. He orders the chauffeur to stop the car. The chauffeur opens the passenger door for the millionaire, who walks over to the mother and snatches the loaf. He slips back into the car and they drive on, leaving behind an even poorer family and a baffled crowd of sidewalk witnesses. For his part, the chauffeur feels real qualms about what his master has done, because unlike his employer, he has recently known hard times himself. But he drives on nonetheless. Let’s call this the Chauffeur’s Dilemma.
The Chauffeur’s Dilemma may seem overdrawn, but consider the recent raise in federal taxes for the working poor, compared with Obama-GOP unwillingness to tax those in the top 0.1 or top 0.01% more. Households in the top 0.01% make over $27 million annually, on average. Those in the top 1% captured 67% of all income gains from 2002 to 2007. And yet budgets must be balanced on the backs of teachers and the working poor? Even as the scandal of tax havens, costing taxpayers $100 billion each year, goes unaddressed?
The Chauffeur’s Dilemma has broader relevance to the current US political situation. Bruce Ackerman has feared a “decline and fall of the American Republic,” given that escalating power struggles between the branches of government could leave “the military as a potential arbiter” (85). If the recent uprisings in North Africa teach anything, it is the critical role of army officials at moments of political turmoil.
As Ackerman has noted, in our military, “by 1996, 67% of the senior officer corps were Republicans, and only 7% were Democrats”—a pattern that had continued at least through 2003. Does anyone think that political skew would have no bearing in case another Bush v. Gore-type dispute degenerated into constitutional crisis? If one ever wanted to prove the insularity of the US academy, one could do worse than compare the gallons of ink spilled on viewpoint diversity on campus and the near-invisibility of the partisan skew of the actual guarantors of order in our society. Even demonstrated cases of political targeting by the US domestic intelligence apparatus have generated little outcry.
As Simon Johnson predicted a few years ago, the financial crisis will bring economic pain for years to come. Protests like the ones going on in Wisconsin may continue, or may fizzle in an increasingly fragmented America. Whatever happens, the “Chauffeur’s Dilemma” is sure to become more common, as those at the top push for a punitive austerity that promises little more than intensification of our current economic woes.
Photo Credit: Mrbula.
February 23, 2011 at 10:11 am
Posted in: Law and Inequality, Military Law, Politics
Print This Post
Responses (6)
aj - February 23, 2011 at 12:11 pm
You seem to have the wrong link for Kevin Drum’s Wisconsin piece. I’m guessing it should be: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-labor-union-decline
Maryland Conservatarian - February 23, 2011 at 1:15 pm
“The Chauffeur’s Dilemma may seem overdrawn…”
My first reaction was “Ya think?”…but then I started to picture Mayor Bloomberg ripping a Big Mac from her hands….
Frank Pasquale - February 23, 2011 at 3:32 pm
aj: I did fix that now…thanks!
MC: A very funny image…for readers who haven’t followed the sugar drama of NYC, here’s some background:
http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/oct/07/mayor-says-food-stamps-shouldnt-cover-sodas/
Brett Bellmore - February 23, 2011 at 7:19 pm
“What’s particularly striking about Walker’s proposal is that it carves out favors for certain public sector unions which supported his election, including the police.”
Except, of course, that they didn’t, in fact, support his election. A handful of local unions representing a fraction of those classes of workers supported him, while the state-wide unions for those same classes of workers opposed him.
Frankly, I think his explanation that he can’t afford to have the police and firefighters acting like the teachers are currently is plausible.
Seth Finkelstein - February 23, 2011 at 10:20 pm
I’m a bit confused why this is put in terms of a chauffeur.
The classic example is scabs brought in to break a union strike, and that police/enlisted military are often drawn from the working-class backgrounds.
Frank Pasquale - February 24, 2011 at 10:39 am
Seth–I think the “scabs” phenomenon has been consigned to the dustbin of history, as the chart at the top of this post suggests:
http://www.newdeal20.org/2011/02/24/the-liquidation-of-society-versus-the-global-labor-revival-36861/
Whereas chauffeurs & butlers are a growth industry!:
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/09/28/butler-of-the-year/
Leave a Reply