<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intensive Parenting Enforced: Parents Criminal Liability for Children Skipping School</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Demanowski</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/comment-page-1#comment-72146</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Demanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29169#comment-72146</guid>
		<description>Holding people responsible for something they have no control over is simply absurd.

We&#039;re not talking about automatons here, these are living, breathing people with a will of their own.

Parents can talk, cajole, even threaten all they want, if that young person decides not to obey, there&#039;s nothing anyone can do except punish them after the fact (and it&#039;s well-established that punishment is one of the least effective methods of inducing long-term behaviour changes).

Parents can drive the kids, door to door, deposit them personally in the classroom, if the kid decides to duck out (and they&#039;ll find a way, even in the strictest environments - kids can have tremendous willpower) there&#039;s nothing the parents, teachers, or school administrators can do about it.

Short of creating an atmosphere of slavery by standing over them with a whip 24/7, or completely breaking their will with &quot;brainwashing&quot; and torture techniques, nobody has complete control over another human being.

Want to keep kids in school?  Make it interesting enough that they *want* to stay.  

Listen to the kids!  They&#039;re telling you that the schooling you&#039;re providing for them is BORING THEM TO DEATH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holding people responsible for something they have no control over is simply absurd.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not talking about automatons here, these are living, breathing people with a will of their own.</p>
<p>Parents can talk, cajole, even threaten all they want, if that young person decides not to obey, there&#8217;s nothing anyone can do except punish them after the fact (and it&#8217;s well-established that punishment is one of the least effective methods of inducing long-term behaviour changes).</p>
<p>Parents can drive the kids, door to door, deposit them personally in the classroom, if the kid decides to duck out (and they&#8217;ll find a way, even in the strictest environments &#8211; kids can have tremendous willpower) there&#8217;s nothing the parents, teachers, or school administrators can do about it.</p>
<p>Short of creating an atmosphere of slavery by standing over them with a whip 24/7, or completely breaking their will with &#8220;brainwashing&#8221; and torture techniques, nobody has complete control over another human being.</p>
<p>Want to keep kids in school?  Make it interesting enough that they *want* to stay.  </p>
<p>Listen to the kids!  They&#8217;re telling you that the schooling you&#8217;re providing for them is BORING THEM TO DEATH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DelD</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/comment-page-1#comment-71339</link>
		<dc:creator>DelD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29169#comment-71339</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, in parts of rural Northern Calfornia, felony prosecutions for truancy are all the rage...

http://www.willows-journal.com/articles/corning-4763-truancy-forgery.html

http://www.orland-press-register.com/articles/anderson-5139-school-district.html

Unbelievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, in parts of rural Northern Calfornia, felony prosecutions for truancy are all the rage&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.willows-journal.com/articles/corning-4763-truancy-forgery.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.willows-journal.com/articles/corning-4763-truancy-forgery.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.orland-press-register.com/articles/anderson-5139-school-district.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.orland-press-register.com/articles/anderson-5139-school-district.html</a></p>
<p>Unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May 26 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/comment-page-1#comment-71271</link>
		<dc:creator>May 26 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 11:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29169#comment-71271</guid>
		<description>[...] Parenting Enforced: Parents Criminal Liability for Children Skipping School&#8221; [Gaia Bernstein, ConcurOp on a California [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parenting Enforced: Parents Criminal Liability for Children Skipping School&#8221; [Gaia Bernstein, ConcurOp on a California [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State University Presidents Receive Hefty Raises &#124; World University Information</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/comment-page-1#comment-71169</link>
		<dc:creator>State University Presidents Receive Hefty Raises &#124; World University Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 10:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29169#comment-71169</guid>
		<description>[...] Concurring Opinions » Intensive Parenting Enforced: Parents &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Concurring Opinions » Intensive Parenting Enforced: Parents &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/intensive-parenting-enforced-parents-criminal-liability-for-children-skipping-school.html/comment-page-1#comment-71125</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29169#comment-71125</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I&#039;d accuse parents ensuring their kids are in school of &quot;intensive parenting&quot;; seems rather a bare minimum to me but this could just be semantics. 

I&#039;m kind of surprised that this (truancy) is still a problem in CA - what with the President&#039;s moving words of encouragement to stay or get in school. But I&#039;m guessing the $2,000 fine is probably the selling point for a cash-strapped state like CA. 

And what happens if it turns out that such a law &quot;disproportionately impacts&quot; (see, I can talk like a liberal activist) the illegal - I mean undocumented - &quot;community&quot;? Can they avoid jail and/or the fine by just agreeing to go back home? Would this be a deportable offense?(it could be spun as child neglect or abuse). 

So many questions - still I&#039;m inclined to agree with you that this would not be a good law. Instead, when it comes to truancy, I&#039;d suggest CA stick with the old tried-and-true favorites: Blame Society and, of course, George Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I&#8217;d accuse parents ensuring their kids are in school of &#8220;intensive parenting&#8221;; seems rather a bare minimum to me but this could just be semantics. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of surprised that this (truancy) is still a problem in CA &#8211; what with the President&#8217;s moving words of encouragement to stay or get in school. But I&#8217;m guessing the $2,000 fine is probably the selling point for a cash-strapped state like CA. </p>
<p>And what happens if it turns out that such a law &#8220;disproportionately impacts&#8221; (see, I can talk like a liberal activist) the illegal &#8211; I mean undocumented &#8211; &#8220;community&#8221;? Can they avoid jail and/or the fine by just agreeing to go back home? Would this be a deportable offense?(it could be spun as child neglect or abuse). </p>
<p>So many questions &#8211; still I&#8217;m inclined to agree with you that this would not be a good law. Instead, when it comes to truancy, I&#8217;d suggest CA stick with the old tried-and-true favorites: Blame Society and, of course, George Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

