Site Meter

Graham v. Florida: What Justice Thomas Gets Right, Part II

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. Ponyo says:

    It’s always fascinating to me how Supreme Court Justices can easily reinterpreted that which supposedly has already been decided simply by pointing to so-called “ambiguities.” I’m not saying what they do isn’t valid, but it definitely points to how arbitrary our legal system can be. I found this article about lawsuits being filed against the oil company responsible for this spill in Mexico: http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2010/05/12/scores-of-lawsuits-filed-following-the-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill/
    Now despite the injustice, I’m sure the litigants’ cases will be dismissed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image