<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graham v. Florida &#8211; Collapse of Capital-Noncapital Distinction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/graham-v-florida-collapse-of-capital-noncapital-distinction.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/graham-v-florida-collapse-of-capital-noncapital-distinction.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTUSblog &#187; Tuesday round-up</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/graham-v-florida-collapse-of-capital-noncapital-distinction.html/comment-page-1#comment-70862</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTUSblog &#187; Tuesday round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=28901#comment-70862</guid>
		<description>[...] the blogosphere, at Concurring Opinions, Youngjae Lee describes the decision as “[p]otentally revolutionary” in the way it could change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blogosphere, at Concurring Opinions, Youngjae Lee describes the decision as “[p]otentally revolutionary” in the way it could change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expanding Graham &#124; a public defender</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/graham-v-florida-collapse-of-capital-noncapital-distinction.html/comment-page-1#comment-70829</link>
		<dc:creator>Expanding Graham &#124; a public defender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=28901#comment-70829</guid>
		<description>[...] LWOP for all juveniles violates the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments [and I&#039;m not the only one to notice this potential]. The converse of that argument &#8211; that juveniles who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LWOP for all juveniles violates the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments [and I&#39;m not the only one to notice this potential]. The converse of that argument &#8211; that juveniles who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

