Graham, Kennedy, and Offenses Against the State

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. BL1Y says:

    I think the Supreme Court is aware that there are few drug kingpins who are minors. This language likely satisfies an intellectual curiosity about how we would treat such people…or rather, it satisfies the need to keep that debate open.

    I doubt we’re going to be trying any underage spies or drug lords. The possibility of an underage terrorist is pretty real, but we don’t give them trials anyways.

    Odds are this was just put in to get a justice or two on board with the majority and avoid unnecessary concurring opinions.