Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Bruce Boyden on Stealing the Throne

    • Joe on Stealing the Throne

    • Bruce Boyden on Stealing the Throne

    • Joe on Stealing the Throne

    • Michael Risch on Stealing the Throne

    • Bruce Boyden on Stealing the Throne

    • Michael Risch on Stealing the Throne

    • Joe on Stealing the Throne

    • kormal on Stealing the Throne

    • Anon Reader on Stealing the Throne

    • Greg Lukianoff on Cyberbullying and the Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys

    • Orin Kerr on Simple Justice and Blogging Exhaustion

    • James A.W. Shaw on Labor law in the age of social media

    • nidefatt on Private Prison Profiteering

    • James Grimmelmann on Private Prison Profiteering
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Do Young People Care About Privacy?

posted by Daniel Solove

One of the most frequent questions I get asked when talking about my book, The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet is what to do about the troublesome younger generation which “doesn’t seem to care about privacy.”  “Those foolish kids,” some people say, “they have no concept of privacy.  They just bare their whole lives on the Internet.  Privacy is a generational thing, and the new generations just don’t give a damn.”

Do young people care about privacy?

The answer is yes.

I’ve often responded to the question by arguing the following:

1. Young people understand privacy in a nuanced way.  They don’t see it as involving total secrecy of their information.  Instead, they view privacy as the right to control the extent to which their information is disseminated and how it is used.  For example, the fact that a person shares private information on her Facebook page, which is accessible to 100 friends, doesn’t mean that she wants to share it with the world.  Privacy isn’t binary — it isn’t all or nothing.

2. Young people still care about how information is used.  Like previous generations, they don’t like being defrauded  (identity theft) or being inundated by junk mail and telemarketing calls or other forms of torture.

3. Young people’s attitudes might also not represent a generational shift, but a typical youthful not thinking about the consequences of their behavior.  When it comes to online sharing of information, this problem is compounded by the fact adults aren’t fully aware of it.

Now there is some great new evidence about how young people think about privacy. A new study by Chris Hoofnagle, Jennifer King, Su Li, and Joseph Turow sheds new light on the attitudes of those pesky young folks.  It is entitled: How Different are Young Adults from Older Adults When it Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies?

The report indicates that the young’s attitudes toward privacy don’t differ from those of adults as much as we had thought.  In many cases, they barely differ at all.

Here are some of the survey’s results:

“Have you ever refused to give information to a business or a company because you thought it was not really necessary or was too personal?”

88% of people of all ages said “yes.”  82% of young adults (18-24 years old) said yes.

“Generally speaking, anyone who uploads a photo or video of me to the internet where I am clearly recognizable should first get my permission.”

86% of people of all ages agreed with this statement, and 84% of young adults agreed.

“Do you think there should be a law that requires websites and advertising
companies to delete all stored information about an individual, or do you feel such a law is not necessary?”

92% of people of all ages said that there should be such a law, as did 88% of young adults.

“Compared to five years ago, would you say you are more concerned about privacy issues on the internet, less concerned, or that you have the same level of concern?”

55% of people of all ages said they were more concerned (only 6% said less concerned) and 54% of young adults said they were more concerned (with only 9% saying they were less concerned).

“If a company purchases or uses someone’s personal information illegally, about how much—if anything—do you think that company should be fined?”

The vast majority of people of all ages (69%) said the fine should be greater than $2500.  They were given choices of $100, $500, $1000, $2500, and more than $2500.

The study concludes by stating:

In policy circles, it has become almost a cliché to claim that young people do not care about privacy. Certainly there are many troubling anecdotes surrounding young individuals’ use of the internet, and of social networking sites in particular. Nevertheless, we found that in large proportions young adults do care about privacy. The data show that they and older adults are more alike on many privacy topics than they are different. We suggest, then, that young-adult Americans have an aspiration for increased privacy even while they participate in an online reality that is optimized to increase their revelation of personal data.

There are many more fascinating findings in the report.  Be sure to check it out.


 April 17, 2010 at 10:30 am   Posted in: Privacy, Privacy (Consumer Privacy), Privacy (Electronic Surveillance), Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (4)

  1. ninja - April 17, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    yes i agree. young people are just subtle about information in a different way than older people. sharing information is about how you share it, not what you’re sharing. young people can be pretty cagey. You can be naive at any age. So anyone can find herself stalked as easily as someone else can find himself out money if they share the wrong information.

  2. dave hoffman - April 17, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    Wouldn’t evidence of people’s actual behavior be a better piece of evidence than these survey results? If their behavior (w/r/t, say, Facebook information) contrasts with these findings, which are we to believe?

  3. Daniel Solove - April 17, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    Dave,

    Behavioral data isn’t necessarily better, as there are many things that can skew behavior. People often have mistaken assumptions about how websites protect their privacy (they think they have a lot more privacy protection than they do). And what does sharing data on Facebook mean? It might mean that a person doesn’t expect privacy. It might mean that the person expects it to be shared with her friends only and views it as a privacy violation to have it shared more widely. It might mean that the person expects it to be shared with her friends and not used by Facebook or others for other purposes.

    In other contexts, people aren’t aware of the extent to which they are sharing information. Or they are aware but feel they don’t have much of a choice in how their data is used.

    So interpreting the behavior and what it indicates about attitudes can be quite difficult. Of course, surveys about attitudes are also prone to error, for people can readily say things but not do them.

    I’m not saying looking at surveys is better than looking at behavior — both are prone to error.

  4. Generation Y does care, or doesn’t it? « AnneZozo's Blog - April 20, 2010 at 11:43 pm

    [...] http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/do-young-people-care-about-privacy.html [...]

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress