Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Mike on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Ben on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Samir Chopra on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Chris Berry on Who Gets to Keep Trover?

    • Prof. W. Matias on Introducing Guest Blogger andré douglas pond cummings

    • Andrew on Public Finance and National Security

    • Joe on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Timothy Zick on Free Speech Architecture - Responses

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on On the Servicing Settlement

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on On the Servicing Settlement
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Will Latinos Check Black on the Census?

posted by Solangel Maldonado

Last week, I noted that conceptions of race in Latin American are different from those commonly held in the U.S.  Since then, I have received many comments both on Concurring Opinions and offline and have listened to several programs and panels on the U.S. Census and Latinos.  In this post, I want to explore why Latinos, even those who were raised in the U.S. or have lived here most of their adult lives continue to reject U.S. conceptions of race.  After all, immigrants often adopt the norms of their new country after a relatively short period of time (a generation?) so why not adopt U.S. definitions of race?

Undoubtedly, one reason why Latinos reject U.S. definitions of race is prejudice against Blacks.  Some Latinos deny their African ancestry because they hold negative views about African-Americans.  This is illustrated in a public service video that seeks to encourage Latinos of African descent to identify as both Hispanic and Black on the 2010 Census.  In this video, a Latina grandmother rejects her grandson’s friends because she erroneously assumes that they are African-American when, actually, they are Latinos of African ancestry.

Latinos are proud of their Spanish and indigenous ancestry, and some spend a lot of time tracing these roots.  However, some Latinos rarely acknowledge their African ancestry and those that do, often attempt to minimize it.  Some Latinos say things like “En mi familia no hay negros” (there are no Blacks in my family) when they know that their grandmother or great-grandfather is of African descent.  Latinos’ denial of their African ancestry impacts their ability to protect their civil rights.  For example, as Professor Tanya Hernandez argued in a 2002 article, Puerto Ricans on the island rarely file race discrimination claims because doing so would require them to admit that they are Black.

Studies have documented Latinos’ biases against Blacks.  Studies have found that some Latinos, especially older Latinos and recent immigrants, prefer to maintain social distance from African Americans, for example, identifying African Americans as the least desirable neighbors and marriage partners.  This might explain why intermarriage rates between Latinos and Caucasians are higher than between Latinos and African-Americans.  Latinos’ biases against Blacks are often unconscious.  For example, Latinos intending to complement someone who is Black might say things like “aunque es negro, no hay mejor hombre que ese”  (even though he’s Black, there’s no better man than he) or “aunque es negra, tiena un corazon blanco” (even though she’s Black, she has a white heart, meaning that the person has a good heart).

Yet, despite this evidence of anti-Black sentiment, I think that some Latinos will refuse to identify as Black in the Census, not because they are prejudiced against Blacks or wish to deny their African ancestry, but rather because (1) they really do not understand U.S. genealogical definitions of race, or (2) they consciously reject these definitions.  U.S. definitions of race, as evidenced by the one-drop rule, are the result of a system that sought to maintain white racial purity and supremacy.  In Latin-America, almost everyone is of mixed race.  The Spaniards who landed in Puerto Rico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, etc. had sexual relations (sometimes consensual, sometimes not) with indigenous women and the African slaves they brought to the New World.  The children of those unions are a mix of different races.  Thus, few people from Latin America are just one race.

Of course, as one of the comments to my previous post pointed out, there is no such thing as biological race.  We cannot tell from looking at a person’s genes whether she is Caucasian, Black, Asian, or Native-American.  Further, there are often greater genetic variations between people believed to be of the same race than between individuals believed to be of different races.   So if race is not biologically determined, why does the Census keep asking us to identify our race and why shouldn’t we simply write “human” or ignore the question?

The reason is that race, as socially constructed, continues to matter.  We still make certain assumptions about people when we first meet them based primarily on what we believe to be their race.  The police and immigration officials make assumptions about who belongs or who is more likely to have committed a crime based on race.  Employers and landlords make decisions as to who to hire or rent an apartment based on race.

Latinos who appear to be of African descent have high unemployment rates and are more likely than other Latinos to live below the poverty level.   They are also likely to be perceived as African-American and to experience racism and its effects.  According to the nonprofit group AfroLatin@forum, Latinos of African descent should identify as both Latino and Black in the Census because when they are not counted as Black, “it deprives organizations of resources they need to improve the lives of [Afro-Latinos].”  Others fear that when Latinos select “White” it “risks leaving a mistaken impression that they enjoy certain socioeconomic opportunities we associate with whites in this country . . . when in reality [Hispanics] are near the bottom in areas like education and upward mobility.”   I agree, but I am skeptical that Latinos will identify as Black in the Census.


 March 31, 2010 at 12:27 pm   Posted in: Race   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (3)

  1. Maryland Conservatarian - March 31, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    If certain Latinos – or anyone – decides to “consciously reject these definitions” – God bless ‘em! I just don’t see a problem here.

    Me? I answered “American.”

  2. Greg - March 31, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    One of the things I noticed when I was in Mexico City was the way that missing persons were described on fliers in subway stations, post offices, etc. There was no indicator of “race,” but there was an indicator of “skin color,” which ranged from light to dark. This isn’t to say there was no conception of race – the presentation of Mexican history, as puts a lot of emphasis on the conflict between and eventual merger of Spanish and Mexica peoples. But it does seem be thought of somewhat differently than in the U.S.

  3. Latest Bee World Auctions - April 1, 2010 at 9:02 am

    [...] Concurring Opinions » Will Latinos Check Black on the Census? [...]

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress