The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 119, Issue 4 & Forthcoming Supreme Court Conference
posted by Yale Law Journal
January 2010 | Volume 119, Issue 4
| ARTICLES | ||
| Antibankruptcy Douglas G. Baird & Robert K. Rasmussen |
648 | |
| Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data Orin S. Kerr |
700 | |
| FEATURE | ||
| American Needle v. NFL: An Opportunity To Reshape Sports Law Michael A. McCann |
726 | |
| NOTE | ||
| Strategic or Sincere? Analyzing Agency Use of Guidance Documents Connor N. Raso |
782 | |
| COMMENTS | ||
| Suspending the Writ at Guantánamo: Take III? | 825 | |
| Constitutional Avoidance Step Zero | 837 | |
On Tuesday, March 23, 2010, The Yale Law Journal Online will join with the Yale Law School Supreme Court Advocacy Clinic to host the concluding segment of “Important Questions of Federal Law: Assessing the Supreme Court’s Case Selection Process.” The panel will bring together federal judges, members of the legal academia, and practitioners to discuss potential reforms to the Supreme Court’s certiorari process. All events will be held at Yale Law School’s Sterling Law Building in New Haven, CT. Please click here for more information.
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS OF FEDERAL LAW
Yale Law School | New Haven, CT | March 23, 2010
Panel I: The Judge’s Perspective: Is the Court Taking the “Right” Cases?
4:10pm‐5:30pm, Room 129
Moderator: Linda Greenhouse (Yale Law School)
Panelists:
The Honorable José Cabranes (2d Cir.)
Drew Days (Yale Law School)
The Honorable Brett Kavanaugh (D.C. Cir.)
The Honorable Sandra Lynch (1st Cir.)
Panel II: The Practitioners’ Perspective: What Makes An Issue “Important” to the Court?
5:40pm‐6:55pm, Room 127
Moderator: Charles Rothfeld (Mayer Brown LLP and Yale Law School)
Panelists:
John Elwood (Vinson & Elkins LLP)
Orin Kerr (George Washington University Law School)
Patricia Millett (Akin Gump LLP)
Judith Resnik (Yale Law School)
March 9, 2010 at 9:44 pm
Posted in: Administrative Law, Bankruptcy, Civil Rights, Conferences, Constitutional Law, Cyberlaw, Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents, Law Rev Forum, Supreme Court
Print This Post
Comments are closed for this entry.