Site Meter

SCOTUS Chides Posner/Easterbrook in Jones v. Harris

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. MJG says:

    Good post, though not sure if I agree that Posner is as at fault as Easterbrook. Judging requires context, and sometimes that context requires some knowledge of markets and the marketplace (this is a case about whether fees being charged are permissible under the statute). I understand the Supreme Court’s fear that the Easterbrook/Posner approach gives too much power to judges who fancy themselves geniuses on matters outside their competences (especially those not as smart as Frank and Richard), but I don’t see how literally ALL of the market related ideas they discussed are irrelevant.

    Indeed, I found the Jones opinion a little exhausting as it raised factor after factor and then admonished courts to “consider all the factors” without providing much context or guidance. Yes, there is a body of caselaw to work from, but the Supreme Court’s opinion, being untethered from a real case really, could have been a sentence or two, boiling down to consider all the factors. Because there was no context I don’t think Jones v Harris will have much influence at all, other than rebuking a challenge to the test courts have traditionally used.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image