<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googling Employees: Why Your Online Reputation Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links &#124; The Big &#34;D&#34;</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68763</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Links &#124; The Big &#34;D&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68763</guid>
		<description>[...] the United States) rejected potential employees because of information found out about them online http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-mat... However, fewer than 15% of people believe their online information will matter.&#160; I Need to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the United States) rejected potential employees because of information found out about them online <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-mat.." rel="nofollow">http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-mat..</a>. However, fewer than 15% of people believe their online information will matter.&nbsp; I Need to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhubarb bob</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68547</link>
		<dc:creator>rhubarb bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68547</guid>
		<description>&quot;This practice of Googling employees and checking Facebook pages strikes me as lazy background checking. Whatever happend to picking up the phone and calling former employers for background information?&quot;

Former investigator here. Have performed and managed literally thousands of background checks.

1) 

Employment verification is part of the standard background check but so is establishing online profile. But it&#039;s usually valueless: if you don&#039;t have a letter of recommendation from an old boss, most companies&#039; policy is to say &quot;yes, Alex Rodriguez worker here from May 2000 to June 2004&quot;, and that&#039;s it. You rarely get any useful information from reference checks.

2) Very few HR depts actually know how to conduct a proper background check, usually it&#039;s outsourced. Background checks are usually only done after an offer is made. How intensive the check is will depend on how much money you want to pay, which depends on how important the candidate is, what the industry is, and how organized the HR dept is. 

3) A proper background check goes more intensively into online profile than just google. What we&#039;re talking about here is just HR people and managers idly googling you. If they can do it and find out you look like a douche, then  clients can do it just as easily. How much this matters depends on how important you are or how much your firm wants to hire/fire you.

Bottom line: the internet is a public space open to all. Don&#039;t make any comment in your own name (or traceable to you by image, email address, phone number etc) that you wouldn&#039;t want printed out and posted on the noticeboard at work. And never trust social networks&#039; privacy settings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This practice of Googling employees and checking Facebook pages strikes me as lazy background checking. Whatever happend to picking up the phone and calling former employers for background information?&#8221;</p>
<p>Former investigator here. Have performed and managed literally thousands of background checks.</p>
<p>1) </p>
<p>Employment verification is part of the standard background check but so is establishing online profile. But it&#8217;s usually valueless: if you don&#8217;t have a letter of recommendation from an old boss, most companies&#8217; policy is to say &#8220;yes, Alex Rodriguez worker here from May 2000 to June 2004&#8243;, and that&#8217;s it. You rarely get any useful information from reference checks.</p>
<p>2) Very few HR depts actually know how to conduct a proper background check, usually it&#8217;s outsourced. Background checks are usually only done after an offer is made. How intensive the check is will depend on how much money you want to pay, which depends on how important the candidate is, what the industry is, and how organized the HR dept is. </p>
<p>3) A proper background check goes more intensively into online profile than just google. What we&#8217;re talking about here is just HR people and managers idly googling you. If they can do it and find out you look like a douche, then  clients can do it just as easily. How much this matters depends on how important you are or how much your firm wants to hire/fire you.</p>
<p>Bottom line: the internet is a public space open to all. Don&#8217;t make any comment in your own name (or traceable to you by image, email address, phone number etc) that you wouldn&#8217;t want printed out and posted on the noticeboard at work. And never trust social networks&#8217; privacy settings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bimme</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68405</link>
		<dc:creator>bimme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68405</guid>
		<description>Most employers won&#039;t give references beyond dates of employment, job title, and -- only sometimes -- rate of pay.  They also prohibit their employees from giving recommendations.  So the employers who are looking to hire people often are left with what they *can* find out, which is what&#039;s online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most employers won&#8217;t give references beyond dates of employment, job title, and &#8212; only sometimes &#8212; rate of pay.  They also prohibit their employees from giving recommendations.  So the employers who are looking to hire people often are left with what they *can* find out, which is what&#8217;s online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 70% of employers screen using Facebook etc. &#171; Reading Tea Leaves by Randy Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68400</link>
		<dc:creator>70% of employers screen using Facebook etc. &#171; Reading Tea Leaves by Randy Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68400</guid>
		<description>[...] of employers screen using Facebook&#160;etc. By Randy Wilson  According to this Microsoft study, 70% used information they found out about a potential candidate to reject them for employment.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of employers screen using Facebook&nbsp;etc. By Randy Wilson  According to this Microsoft study, 70% used information they found out about a potential candidate to reject them for employment.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68385</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68385</guid>
		<description>Christa:  I think the simplest explanation is efficiency, or less charitably, laziness.  Googling takes seconds.  If you&#039;ve got a stack of resumes to go through, maybe you can junk 2/3 of them in moments... then check actual references for the ones who don&#039;t come off as drunken fratboys or the like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christa:  I think the simplest explanation is efficiency, or less charitably, laziness.  Googling takes seconds.  If you&#8217;ve got a stack of resumes to go through, maybe you can junk 2/3 of them in moments&#8230; then check actual references for the ones who don&#8217;t come off as drunken fratboys or the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christa</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68354</link>
		<dc:creator>Christa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68354</guid>
		<description>I second DMG&#039;s comment.  Why is it that legal employers tend not to contact references and even refuse reference letters, yet would take the time to Google you?  I think that I have raving fans for most references, but an internet search would never tell you so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second DMG&#8217;s comment.  Why is it that legal employers tend not to contact references and even refuse reference letters, yet would take the time to Google you?  I think that I have raving fans for most references, but an internet search would never tell you so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Mac Gregor</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68352</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Mac Gregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68352</guid>
		<description>This practice of Googling employees and checking Facebook pages strikes me as lazy background checking.  Whatever happend to picking up the phone and calling former employers for background information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This practice of Googling employees and checking Facebook pages strikes me as lazy background checking.  Whatever happend to picking up the phone and calling former employers for background information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/googling-employees-why-your-online-reputation-matters.html/comment-page-1#comment-68331</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26044#comment-68331</guid>
		<description>One of the most worrisome aspects of Google&#039;s algorithmic choices is the way that it can favor sites which thrive on pageview-seeking (the web version of talk-radio). The implications for on jobs-seeking are quite frightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most worrisome aspects of Google&#8217;s algorithmic choices is the way that it can favor sites which thrive on pageview-seeking (the web version of talk-radio). The implications for on jobs-seeking are quite frightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

