Site Meter

Error in SCOTUS Jones v. Harris Opinion

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. MJG says:

    Wow. Good stuff. Sounds to me like the Court (or at least Justice Alito) wanted to jump from one conclusion supported by the cases to one it wants to be supported, i.e. that enforcement of this section results in courts acting as “ratemakers.”

  2. Logan Roise says:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image