<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acceptable Deviance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/acceptable-deviance.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/acceptable-deviance.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #247 &#124; a public defender</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/acceptable-deviance.html/comment-page-1#comment-67217</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #247 &#124; a public defender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23934#comment-67217</guid>
		<description>[...] science that infests our courts and leads to dubious convictions; and Mark Edwards at Co-Op explores the idea of acceptable deviance &#8211; in other words the gap between the law and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] science that infests our courts and leads to dubious convictions; and Mark Edwards at Co-Op explores the idea of acceptable deviance &#8211; in other words the gap between the law and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/acceptable-deviance.html/comment-page-1#comment-67048</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23934#comment-67048</guid>
		<description>The workers remind me of investors in non-guaranteed government sponsored enterprises who talk about implied government support of the enterprise (be it Fannie Mae or a Middle Eastern royalty affiliated business).  Also, those workers probably lived in company or formerly company owned housing from which they were not being evicted for not paying the rent upon.

A parallel example of the living law is the French practice of tolerating the kidnapping of corporate executives as a tactic in labor disputes when the executive is not actually physically harmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The workers remind me of investors in non-guaranteed government sponsored enterprises who talk about implied government support of the enterprise (be it Fannie Mae or a Middle Eastern royalty affiliated business).  Also, those workers probably lived in company or formerly company owned housing from which they were not being evicted for not paying the rent upon.</p>
<p>A parallel example of the living law is the French practice of tolerating the kidnapping of corporate executives as a tactic in labor disputes when the executive is not actually physically harmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

