Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc PCAOB Roundtable
posted by Vanderbilt Law Review
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the response pieces, as well as Professor Strauss’s table setting article, for its inaugural Roundtable. Professors Peter Strauss, Hal Bruff, Steven Calabresi, Gary Lawson, and Christopher Yoo have responded to the “first take” articles each wrote last month. The debate is on Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
TABLE SETTING ARTICLE
Peter L. Strauss, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 51 (2009).
RESPONSES
Peter L. Strauss, Our Twenty-First Century Constitution, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 121 (2009).
Harold H. Bruff, On Hunting Elephants in Mouseholes, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 127 (2009).
Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo, Why Professors Bruff and Pildes are Wrong about the PCAOB Case, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 133 (2009).
Gary Lawson, It Depends, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 139 (2009).
December 16, 2009 at 6:44 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Print This Post
Leave a Reply