<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canary in the Coal Mine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/canary-in-the-coal-mine.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/canary-in-the-coal-mine.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/canary-in-the-coal-mine.html/comment-page-1#comment-66620</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22985#comment-66620</guid>
		<description>It certainly would be better than some of the arguments put forward in the literature.

But with regard to the health-care bill, won&#039;t there be issues of standing that aren&#039;t present in Comstock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly would be better than some of the arguments put forward in the literature.</p>
<p>But with regard to the health-care bill, won&#8217;t there be issues of standing that aren&#8217;t present in Comstock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/canary-in-the-coal-mine.html/comment-page-1#comment-66618</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22985#comment-66618</guid>
		<description>No less an authority than Speaker Pelosi has already weighed in with her analysis of this very (what she obviously considers already settled) question: 

&quot;Are you serious? Are you serious?&quot;

I&#039;ll bet she could get that published as a law review article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No less an authority than Speaker Pelosi has already weighed in with her analysis of this very (what she obviously considers already settled) question: </p>
<p>&#8220;Are you serious? Are you serious?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet she could get that published as a law review article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

