<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integration through contract?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/integration-through-contract.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/integration-through-contract.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Sutter</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/integration-through-contract.html/comment-page-1#comment-66418</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22442#comment-66418</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a desired outcome, from Prof. Dr. Böhmer&#039;s and the CDU&#039;s perspective, for the contracts to alienate those who would find them alienating. Perhaps one way to achieve a higher success rate at integration is to filter out the less-motivated. As for the enforceability of the contracts, perhaps they could serve as some sort of estoppel, e.g. in a civil lawsuit involving a conflict between a some home country cultural practice and another party&#039;s rights or obligations under German and EU law. I.e., the immigrant would be estopped from asserting the cultural practice as a justification or basis for reducing liability. And perhaps even in a criminal case, from asserting it as a defense or in mitigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a desired outcome, from Prof. Dr. Böhmer&#8217;s and the CDU&#8217;s perspective, for the contracts to alienate those who would find them alienating. Perhaps one way to achieve a higher success rate at integration is to filter out the less-motivated. As for the enforceability of the contracts, perhaps they could serve as some sort of estoppel, e.g. in a civil lawsuit involving a conflict between a some home country cultural practice and another party&#8217;s rights or obligations under German and EU law. I.e., the immigrant would be estopped from asserting the cultural practice as a justification or basis for reducing liability. And perhaps even in a criminal case, from asserting it as a defense or in mitigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

