Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


New Supreme Court website (DJS)

A digital-age bird man for Alcatraz?  Tweeting oneself to jail. (DJS)

NYT: How privacy vanishes online (DJS)

Orin Kerr critiques the 11th Circuit on email and the Fourth Amendment (DJS)

Identification by your germs (DJS)

Interview of Professor William Stuntz (DJS)

Professor Eric Goldman on the proposed federal Anti-SLAPP Bill (DJS)

Important advice for new profs: DO NOT make jokes (online or otherwise) about killing your students. (kw)

FTC Report: ID theft is down but overall fraud is up (DJS)

Balkin on reconciliation vs. filibuster (DJS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • another anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • NotAProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • NotAProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • ParanoidProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Andrew Lund on Test Executive Pay by Contract Law, not Delaware Corporate Law

    • Fred B. McKinley on Why the Innocent Are Punished More Harshly Than the Guilty

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Test Executive Pay by Contract Law, not Delaware Corporate Law

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Bruce Boyden on Used Car Salesmen in Delaware

    • ParanoidProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Same here on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

  •  

    Site Meter

Inbox Zero

posted by Dave Hoffman

Several months ago, I was persuaded by this post by Andrew Gelman to try a new productivity method: “I will never again read an email without immediately handling it.” (There’s a whole blog on this topic.  And  nifty video.)  The idea is to prevent bloat in your inbox by keeping it empty.

Here’s the short report on how it’s going.  Not terribly well.  I’m getting better at dealing with the easy emails, but the scholarship-related long term projects are just sitting there like lead balloons.  (e.g., “how would this revision look,” or “here’s are some R-scripts. check them out when you’ve time”.)  Moreover, I now have created tons of subfolders to shunt incoming mail to (e.g., “friends,” “enemies,” “colleagues who are neither friends nor enemies,” “students who need to learn courtesy”, “SSRN abstracts I wish I’d written”).  This reminds me of how I cleaned my room as a little boy: move everything on the floor to under the bed.

I nominate this thread as an open one to discuss ways lawyers and legal academics handle the daily deluge.


 November 29, 2009 at 6:45 pm   Posted in: Weird   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (4)

  1. Joe - November 29, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    I really hate that you could almost spend all day just answering e-mails without getting the work done that you had planned to before you opened up your inbox.

  2. Michael Risch - November 30, 2009 at 4:19 am

    I tend to respond to emails as soon as they come, to the point of neurotic obsession. I’m not sure that’s the best way to go.

    I leave unhandled email in my inbox, and drop everything else into a folder. My inbox serves as a sort of to-do list; when there are a lot of items, I’m really busy, and when there are few items I’ve got time to work on all the things that matter.

  3. Alex Kreit - December 1, 2009 at 4:59 am

    I’ve been struggling to find an effective method for handling the email madness for the past year or so as well. My current approach, which is working moderately well, is to handle all of my email through webmail and use my mail application solely as a big searchable archiving tool. Within webmail, I delete or reply to (and then delete) anything that I can address quickly right away and leave everything else in my mail box to get to later. If the email concerns an upcoming event, I will put it on my calendar and then delete the message. I started doing this at the beginning of 2009 and was able to maintain an inbox of under about 50 messages up until around the middle of the year. But now I have many many many more messages than that and am getting dangerously close to the out-of-control email situation I was in just one year ago. I’m currently trying to decide whether I need to tweak my method or just work harder at doing email and applying it. … And, of course, all of the above refers just to my law school account. I don’t even want to think about my gmail account, facebook inbox, etc. etc.

  4. Kaimi - December 1, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    I periodically clean my inbox down to the bare scraps. Then I let it balloon to 1200 messages. Then I despair of ever digging to the bottom, and I go post a comment or two on blogs instead. Eventually, I realize that my choices are either clean my inbox or write an exam, and I clean my inbox.

    I don’t think it’s the most efficient system.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Lisa Fairfax
Michelle Harner
Sherrilyn Ifill
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Tuan Samahon
Alfred Yen










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Adam Benforado
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress