<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, The Good: Free Law!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/google-the-good-free-law.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/google-the-good-free-law.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deven Desai</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/google-the-good-free-law.html/comment-page-1#comment-66391</link>
		<dc:creator>Deven Desai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22384#comment-66391</guid>
		<description>RJ, 

Newman! And thanks for the catch. 

TJ,

There are a number of things one may want to study further. At first glance, I&#039;d note that you do not have the same type of relationship with a search engine that you do with Westlaw or Lexis. The study of the searches is a separate matter. In fact, insofar as one identifies a client for Westlaw or Lexis, the information is arguably easier to follow and then raise confidentiality questions. A public search that does not reveal the client is probably less revealing. Still I wonder whether there are ways to back out for whom the search is being done. In addition, lawyers may not want to use Google if it is easier to show a client what the research was via a third party for billing purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RJ, </p>
<p>Newman! And thanks for the catch. </p>
<p>TJ,</p>
<p>There are a number of things one may want to study further. At first glance, I&#8217;d note that you do not have the same type of relationship with a search engine that you do with Westlaw or Lexis. The study of the searches is a separate matter. In fact, insofar as one identifies a client for Westlaw or Lexis, the information is arguably easier to follow and then raise confidentiality questions. A public search that does not reveal the client is probably less revealing. Still I wonder whether there are ways to back out for whom the search is being done. In addition, lawyers may not want to use Google if it is easier to show a client what the research was via a third party for billing purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/google-the-good-free-law.html/comment-page-1#comment-66389</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22384#comment-66389</guid>
		<description>Freudian slip?  The first sentence should probably read, &quot;I do think that *not* all The Google does is bad.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freudian slip?  The first sentence should probably read, &#8220;I do think that *not* all The Google does is bad.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/google-the-good-free-law.html/comment-page-1#comment-66387</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22384#comment-66387</guid>
		<description>I have never read my contract with Westlaw/Lexis, but I have always assumed that they study the searches I use and have no obligation to keep it confidential.  Is there something different on the client confidentiality front between using Google to search and using Lexis/Westlaw?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never read my contract with Westlaw/Lexis, but I have always assumed that they study the searches I use and have no obligation to keep it confidential.  Is there something different on the client confidentiality front between using Google to search and using Lexis/Westlaw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

