Comments on: Doe v. Wal-Mart: Must Common Law be Reformed to Protect Workers? http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/doe-v-wal-mart-must-common-law-be-reformed-to-protect-workers.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:44:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: The Writing On The Wal » Blog Archive » A WALMART OMNIBUS… http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/doe-v-wal-mart-must-common-law-be-reformed-to-protect-workers.html/comment-page-1#comment-66357 The Writing On The Wal » Blog Archive » A WALMART OMNIBUS… Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:16:50 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21930#comment-66357 [...] Doe v. Wal-Mart: Must Common Law be Reformed to Protect Workers? [...] [...] Doe v. Wal-Mart: Must Common Law be Reformed to Protect Workers? [...]

]]> By: A.J. Sutter http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/doe-v-wal-mart-must-common-law-be-reformed-to-protect-workers.html/comment-page-1#comment-66166 A.J. Sutter Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:50:45 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21930#comment-66166 But think of the efficiencies of Wal-Mart's not having to monitor and enforce the agreements. If they had to incur that expense, what with suppliers all over the world, consumers might have to pay higher prices. -- just kidding. A post like this is a salutary breath of fresh air, even in a relatively enlightened blog like the present one. But think of the efficiencies of Wal-Mart’s not having to monitor and enforce the agreements. If they had to incur that expense, what with suppliers all over the world, consumers might have to pay higher prices.

– just kidding. A post like this is a salutary breath of fresh air, even in a relatively enlightened blog like the present one.

]]>