http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:16:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-66060 Friday Round-up | SCOTUSblog Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:17:58 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21622#comment-66060 [...] Concurring Opinions has links to a number of articles published in the October issue of the William and Mary Law Review, including several which address Supreme Court precedent.  Among them is an editorial piece on Jones v. Harris, which is being argued next week.  Also at Concurring Opinions are links to a series of articles from the October issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review.  Most notably, this month’s issue includes a commentary on DC v. Heller (07-290), in which author Andrew Gould suggests an analytical framework for resolving the questions left open in that the 2008 decision. [...] [...] Concurring Opinions has links to a number of articles published in the October issue of the William and Mary Law Review, including several which address Supreme Court precedent.  Among them is an editorial piece on Jones v. Harris, which is being argued next week.  Also at Concurring Opinions are links to a series of articles from the October issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review.  Most notably, this month’s issue includes a commentary on DC v. Heller (07-290), in which author Andrew Gould suggests an analytical framework for resolving the questions left open in that the 2008 decision. [...]

]]> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-66055 Mr. Loan Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:55:39 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21622#comment-66055 Looking forward to hearing more about law review from you. Looking forward to hearing more about law review from you.

]]>