<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 5 (October 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-5-october-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-5-october-2009.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Round-up &#124; SCOTUSblog</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-5-october-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-66063</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Round-up &#124; SCOTUSblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21571#comment-66063</guid>
		<description>[...] Among them is an editorial piece on Jones v. Harris, which is being argued next week.  Also at Concurring Opinions are links to a series of articles from the October issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review.  Most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Among them is an editorial piece on Jones v. Harris, which is being argued next week.  Also at Concurring Opinions are links to a series of articles from the October issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review.  Most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

