<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UCLA Law Review 57:1 (October)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Round-up: Afternoon Edition &#124; SCOTUSblog</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-66097</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Round-up: Afternoon Edition &#124; SCOTUSblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21643#comment-66097</guid>
		<description>[...] Concurring Opinions links to the October issue of the UCLA Law Review, which includes a piece addressing the ongoing conflict between the protections enshrined in Lawrence v. Texas, which the Court decided in 2003, and the vulnerability inherent in interpersonal relations under the Fourth Amendment.  Also drawing on past Court decisions, Suja A. Thomas of the University of Illinois assesses the new summary judgment standards implemented by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Concurring Opinions links to the October issue of the UCLA Law Review, which includes a piece addressing the ongoing conflict between the protections enshrined in Lawrence v. Texas, which the Court decided in 2003, and the vulnerability inherent in interpersonal relations under the Fourth Amendment.  Also drawing on past Court decisions, Suja A. Thomas of the University of Illinois assesses the new summary judgment standards implemented by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Round-up &#124; SCOTUSblog</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html/comment-page-1#comment-66088</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Round-up &#124; SCOTUSblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21643#comment-66088</guid>
		<description>[...] Concurring Opinions links to the October issue of the UCLA Law Review, which includes a piece addressing the ongoing conflict between the protections enshrined in Lawrence v. Texas, which the Court decided in 2003, and the vulnerability inherent in interpersonal relations under the Fourth Amendment.  Also drawing on past Court decisions, Suja A. Thomas of the University of Illinois assesses the new summary judgment standards implemented by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Concurring Opinions links to the October issue of the UCLA Law Review, which includes a piece addressing the ongoing conflict between the protections enshrined in Lawrence v. Texas, which the Court decided in 2003, and the vulnerability inherent in interpersonal relations under the Fourth Amendment.  Also drawing on past Court decisions, Suja A. Thomas of the University of Illinois assesses the new summary judgment standards implemented by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

