<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Use of DNA Evidence in Criminal Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-use-of-dna-evidence-in-criminal-cases.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-use-of-dna-evidence-in-criminal-cases.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean M.</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-use-of-dna-evidence-in-criminal-cases.html/comment-page-1#comment-65964</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21386#comment-65964</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll just add that this is a very good article. My review tried to snag it, but it looks like NYU noticed it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just add that this is a very good article. My review tried to snag it, but it looks like NYU noticed it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Sutter</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-use-of-dna-evidence-in-criminal-cases.html/comment-page-1#comment-65953</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21386#comment-65953</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there often a further issue about how that particular  DNA came to be used? I.e., not only whether the DNA in question is close to the defendant&#039;s, but also whether the DNA used for the match was planted there, or never at the crime scene at all? And as far as I could tell from Acrobat&#039;s search function (searching on &quot;fake&quot; and &quot;Frumkin&quot;), the article doesn&#039;t reference the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent revelations by Israeli scientists&lt;/a&gt; about how easy it is to fake DNA evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there often a further issue about how that particular  DNA came to be used? I.e., not only whether the DNA in question is close to the defendant&#8217;s, but also whether the DNA used for the match was planted there, or never at the crime scene at all? And as far as I could tell from Acrobat&#8217;s search function (searching on &#8220;fake&#8221; and &#8220;Frumkin&#8221;), the article doesn&#8217;t reference the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18dna.html" rel="nofollow">recent revelations by Israeli scientists</a> about how easy it is to fake DNA evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

