<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modern English Usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Sutter</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/comment-page-1#comment-65551</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20371#comment-65551</guid>
		<description>Mike: Thanks, I didn&#039;t know that. But are you suggesting that the basketball usage means the same as, say, when some female character on a TV drama yells at her two-timing/lackadaisical significant other to &quot;man up&quot; (the only occasion I have to hear the expression, living overseas)? Does telling your boyfriend to stop cheating on you fit in with the basketball usage (see &lt;i&gt;Dexter, Season 2&lt;/i&gt;)? or could the expression have shifted considerably in meaning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Thanks, I didn&#8217;t know that. But are you suggesting that the basketball usage means the same as, say, when some female character on a TV drama yells at her two-timing/lackadaisical significant other to &#8220;man up&#8221; (the only occasion I have to hear the expression, living overseas)? Does telling your boyfriend to stop cheating on you fit in with the basketball usage (see <i>Dexter, Season 2</i>)? or could the expression have shifted considerably in meaning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/comment-page-1#comment-65545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20371#comment-65545</guid>
		<description>I think the term &quot;man up&quot; originates in basketball, to go to man-to-man defense. For what it is worth, women&#039;s basketball use the term that way. So, it is not gendered in basketball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the term &#8220;man up&#8221; originates in basketball, to go to man-to-man defense. For what it is worth, women&#8217;s basketball use the term that way. So, it is not gendered in basketball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Wasserman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/comment-page-1#comment-65535</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Wasserman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20371#comment-65535</guid>
		<description>What if you &quot;cowboy up&quot; (as the 2004 Red Sox used to say). Can one &quot;cowgirl up&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you &#8220;cowboy up&#8221; (as the 2004 Red Sox used to say). Can one &#8220;cowgirl up&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Sutter</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/comment-page-1#comment-65534</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20371#comment-65534</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d always thought that &#039;mensch&#039; (in both German and Yiddish) was grammatically gendered, but not necessarily semantically so. OTOH &#039;man&#039; seems to have become more clearly marked for semantic gender, esp. in the last 30 years or so (maybe other than as an interjection -- though &quot;dude&quot; seems to be making it increasingly irrelevant in that usage). For as long as I can remember, one has been able to say admiringly of a woman that she has &quot;more balls&quot; than some guy -- but that&#039;s a kind of left-handed compliment, usually meant to shame the guy or guys in question. OTOH, &quot;man up&quot; suggests a deficiency of character, not a superfluity of anatomy. For a woman to use &quot;man up&quot; in reference to herself or another woman seems a bit sad, like an expression of what used to be called an oppressed consciousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d always thought that &#8216;mensch&#8217; (in both German and Yiddish) was grammatically gendered, but not necessarily semantically so. OTOH &#8216;man&#8217; seems to have become more clearly marked for semantic gender, esp. in the last 30 years or so (maybe other than as an interjection &#8212; though &#8220;dude&#8221; seems to be making it increasingly irrelevant in that usage). For as long as I can remember, one has been able to say admiringly of a woman that she has &#8220;more balls&#8221; than some guy &#8212; but that&#8217;s a kind of left-handed compliment, usually meant to shame the guy or guys in question. OTOH, &#8220;man up&#8221; suggests a deficiency of character, not a superfluity of anatomy. For a woman to use &#8220;man up&#8221; in reference to herself or another woman seems a bit sad, like an expression of what used to be called an oppressed consciousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam A. Cherry</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/modern-english-usage.html/comment-page-1#comment-65533</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam A. Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20371#comment-65533</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually thought about this.  Can a woman be a mensch?  (Yes, I think, in the non-literal use of that term).  Can someone &quot;person up&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually thought about this.  Can a woman be a mensch?  (Yes, I think, in the non-literal use of that term).  Can someone &#8220;person up&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

