<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elected Judges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/elected-judges.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/elected-judges.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.S. Ruckman, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/elected-judges.html/comment-page-1#comment-64109</link>
		<dc:creator>P.S. Ruckman, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16946#comment-64109</guid>
		<description>What? Political scientists have been studying judicial elections consistantly for some 30 years now! Expand that lit review!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? Political scientists have been studying judicial elections consistantly for some 30 years now! Expand that lit review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Long</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/elected-judges.html/comment-page-1#comment-64075</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16946#comment-64075</guid>
		<description>Let me add to your list Mike Dimino (Widener), who has developed an outstanding body of work on judicial selection, including elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add to your list Mike Dimino (Widener), who has developed an outstanding body of work on judicial selection, including elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/elected-judges.html/comment-page-1#comment-64069</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16946#comment-64069</guid>
		<description>I particularly like Andrew Perlman and Steve Lubet&#039;s comments on Caperton at the Legal Ethics Forum (e.g.: &#039;How many &quot;uncertainties&quot; did Heller raise about future applications of the Second Amendment? I think we could easily list 40 (or 80), some of which were specifically reserved by the majority opinion.&#039;): http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2009/06/more-on-caperton.html#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly like Andrew Perlman and Steve Lubet&#8217;s comments on Caperton at the Legal Ethics Forum (e.g.: &#8216;How many &#8220;uncertainties&#8221; did Heller raise about future applications of the Second Amendment? I think we could easily list 40 (or 80), some of which were specifically reserved by the majority opinion.&#8217;): <a href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2009/06/more-on-caperton.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2009/06/more-on-caperton.html#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

