http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/why-not-a-supreme-empiricist.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:17:18 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3 hourly 1 http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/why-not-a-supreme-empiricist.html/comment-page-1#comment-63242 Juan Carlos Steedos Sat, 09 May 2009 03:52:15 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=15232#comment-63242 Lack of smarts puts original poster firmly in the running. Lack of smarts puts original poster firmly in the running.

]]> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/why-not-a-supreme-empiricist.html/comment-page-1#comment-63174 dmv Thu, 07 May 2009 18:09:05 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=15232#comment-63174 I'm shocked. Someone who does "empirical legal research" wants an "empiricist" on the Court. I have noticed this trend elsewhere: those who work on area X, or using method Y, want a justice knowledgeable in X, or competent with Y. I’m shocked. Someone who does “empirical legal research” wants an “empiricist” on the Court. I have noticed this trend elsewhere: those who work on area X, or using method Y, want a justice knowledgeable in X, or competent with Y.

]]>