http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/stanford-law-review-issue-615-marchfebruary-2009.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:44:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/stanford-law-review-issue-615-marchfebruary-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-63948 Johnny Sock Thu, 28 May 2009 03:42:36 +0000 http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16497#comment-63948 Wow, the Hemphill-Suk article on copryight is embarrassing. How did this get past the editors (I know, don't answer). It's not just that neither has anything interesting to say, but that they clearly don't understand copyright law. This is what happens when faculty members just tell their RAs to get them some cites and get placements based on their positions. This would never survive blind review and I'm embarrassed for SLR, which I though involved faculty at least a little. Terry Fisher and Yochai Benkler must be biting their tongues at HLS at Suk. Wow, the Hemphill-Suk article on copryight is embarrassing. How did this get past the editors (I know, don’t answer). It’s not just that neither has anything interesting to say, but that they clearly don’t understand copyright law. This is what happens when faculty members just tell their RAs to get them some cites and get placements based on their positions. This would never survive blind review and I’m embarrassed for SLR, which I though involved faculty at least a little. Terry Fisher and Yochai Benkler must be biting their tongues at HLS at Suk.

]]>