Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:5 (March 2009)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:5 (March 2009)
ARTICLES
Frederic M. Bloom
Deborah L. Rhode
Private Immigration Screening in the Workplace
Stephen Lee
The Law, Culture, and Economics of Fashion
C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk
RESPONSE
Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman
REPLY
C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk
NOTES
Pleading Sovereign Immunity: The Doctrinal Underpinnings of Hans v. Louisiana and Ex Parte Young
Sina Kian
Who May Be Tried Under the Military Commissions Act of 2006?
Michael Montaño
May 27, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
Responses (1)
Johnny Sock - May 27, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Wow, the Hemphill-Suk article on copryight is embarrassing. How did this get past the editors (I know, don’t answer). It’s not just that neither has anything interesting to say, but that they clearly don’t understand copyright law. This is what happens when faculty members just tell their RAs to get them some cites and get placements based on their positions. This would never survive blind review and I’m embarrassed for SLR, which I though involved faculty at least a little. Terry Fisher and Yochai Benkler must be biting their tongues at HLS at Suk.
Leave a Reply