<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maps and Legends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/maps-and-legends.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/maps-and-legends.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deven</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/maps-and-legends.html/comment-page-1#comment-63991</link>
		<dc:creator>Deven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16588#comment-63991</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

Fully on point in my world. As always thanks and I will check out the sources.

Best,
Deven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>Fully on point in my world. As always thanks and I will check out the sources.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Deven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/maps-and-legends.html/comment-page-1#comment-63963</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16588#comment-63963</guid>
		<description>Deven, 

Not on point, but perhaps tangentially of interest is the fact that one of the most compelling analogies or models of scientific theories in circulation today is the cartographic model: the first systematic treatment I&#039;m aware of is from Philip Kitcher&#039;s Science, Truth and Democracy (2001), chps. 5 &amp; 6: &quot;Mapping Reality,&quot; and &quot;Scientific Significance,&quot; respectively: pp. 55-82, and John Ziman further summarizes the compelling virtues (which has implications for the nature of &#039;realism&#039; in scientific theory) of this analogy in Real Science (2000): 126-132. 

Well, you did write: &quot;please share any other creative and/or challenging uses of maps of which you are aware.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deven, </p>
<p>Not on point, but perhaps tangentially of interest is the fact that one of the most compelling analogies or models of scientific theories in circulation today is the cartographic model: the first systematic treatment I&#8217;m aware of is from Philip Kitcher&#8217;s Science, Truth and Democracy (2001), chps. 5 &amp; 6: &#8220;Mapping Reality,&#8221; and &#8220;Scientific Significance,&#8221; respectively: pp. 55-82, and John Ziman further summarizes the compelling virtues (which has implications for the nature of &#8216;realism&#8217; in scientific theory) of this analogy in Real Science (2000): 126-132. </p>
<p>Well, you did write: &#8220;please share any other creative and/or challenging uses of maps of which you are aware.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

