Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Mike on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Ben on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Samir Chopra on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Chris Berry on Who Gets to Keep Trover?

    • Prof. W. Matias on Introducing Guest Blogger andré douglas pond cummings

    • Andrew on Public Finance and National Security

    • Joe on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Timothy Zick on Free Speech Architecture - Responses

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on On the Servicing Settlement

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on On the Servicing Settlement
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Public opinion on same-sex marriage

posted by Sonja Starr

Thanks again to Danielle and Dan for inviting me to blog here this month. I didn’t expect, when I started this guest-blogging stint, that same-sex marriage would be a primary focus of my posts–it’s something I care about as a citizen, but not one of my academic research fields. But my posts have been largely driven by events, and it seems clear that April 2009 will be looked back upon as a turning point in this civil rights movement. The month started with major developments in Iowa, Vermont, and DC, and today it ends with what strikes me as even bigger news: the Washington Post and ABC News released what I think is the first nationwide poll showing that more respondents support same-sex marriage than oppose it. The split (49% to 46%) is within the poll’s margin of error, but even so, it represents a pretty dramatic shift–less than three years ago, the same poll split 58% opposed and 36% in favor.

The Post article treats this as being largely a story about demographics, and of course that is part of the explanation: young people are much more likely to support marriage equality than older people. But the composition of the population hasn’t changed fast enough to explain shifts of this magnitude in a few years–it’s also got to be that a lot of people, young and old, have changed their minds. As I suggested in an earlier post, court decisions might have contributed to that change–by direct persuasion, by starting a statewide or nationwide conversation that gets people to question traditions, or simply by allowing gay and lesbian couples to begin to marry (which could shape public opinion as people realize that fears about the effects on marriage as a social institution have not panned out).

In any event, whatever the role of courts in bringing about this cultural shift, now that it’s happening, it suggests that the courts will probably play a less central role in pushing the movement toward marriage equality forward in the future. This is increasingly becoming a battle that marriage equality advocates can win in legislatures and at the ballot box. As the poll numbers shift, we’re likely to see increased support for same-sex marriage from politicians who might have been reluctant to take that stand previously. (I suspect this will eventually include President Obama.) That support may be led by Democrats, but it will cross party lines. Of course, this cultural shift is far from being complete, as California voters demonstrated a few months ago. There are still a substantial number of energetic opponents (like the National Organization for Marriage, which I’ve noticed seems to have dropped its priceless “2M4M” slogan). But the road ahead may not be that long. Check out statistician Nate Silver’s state-by-state projections–a few weeks ago, he predicted that every state will have majority support for marriage equality by 2024. Silver also projected that marriage equality would achieve majority support nationwide by “sometime in the 2010s”–so if the Post/ABC News poll is correct, Silver’s projections may have been on the conservative side.

Increasing public support matters, and not just because it is likely to affect the ultimate state of the law–I suspect that given a choice between achieving marriage equality through the courts and achieving it through the democratic process in the same timeframe, just about every equality advocate would prefer the latter (even if the court decisions couldn’t be overturned by referendum). That’s because the battle over same-sex marriage is ultimately one about social meaning–it’s about the expressive power of the law. Sure, it’s about the various legal benefits attached to marriage too, but if that were all it was about, then both sides of the struggle would treat civil unions as being interchangeable with marriage, and they don’t. The recognition of committed same-sex unions as marriages is a social statement that such unions, and the men and women in them, are worthy of respect rather than stigma. So if the ultimate goal is to foster inclusive social norms, then changing public opinion isn’t just a sign that the movement may achieve its goals–in an important sense, changing public opinion is the central goal. Court decisions, in contrast, can only ever be a step along the way.


 April 30, 2009 at 2:07 pm   Posted in: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Politics   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (36)

  1. Wendy - May 1, 2009 at 7:00 am

    Just a quick comment. Whether you’re pro or against gay “marriage”, try seeing it this way…

    No matter what rights gay couples are granted, the majority of us will never take things such as their wedding vows seriously.

    How frustrating that must be, for the couple. So basically I believe that gay couples are still at a disadvantage, no matter how many laws are passed allowing them the same rights as the rest of us.

    This reality should release the conservatives of their angst over changes permitting a gay couple to say “I do”…let’s face it…it’s never going to be the same, or hold the same meaning.

  2. Shane - May 6, 2009 at 10:54 am

    No Im sorry wendy i dont agree I dont think they should even be together but we can’t do anything about it. but we can stop them from getting maried and i hope we do!!

  3. jessica jordan - May 11, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    same-sex marriage i think is every person’s right. Just because some people think it’s wrong doesn’t mean that it should be the law. They’re not hurting anyone.

  4. Steve - June 1, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    It all comes down to EQUAL RIGHTS … If what the Bible says is true, “God created all men equal” then just let EVERYONE be equal. Others say it’s about the children, wouldn’t you want to see those children that are given up/away the chance at a REAL family, to be loved and cherished for just who they are and not a label that society placed on them without their consent or permission … Aren’t those who support a ban on equal rights labeling those who want their own equal rights as the children up for adoption are “categorized” by society … ??? Those individuals are doing this from fear, they do not fully understand the issue before them and it’s so much easier to cross your arms and shake your head from side to side rather than up and down, open your arms and embrace the information available from both sides in order to make up your OWN mind …

  5. sulumits retsambew - June 16, 2009 at 4:58 am

    Just wanna share my opinion about same sex-marriage. Same sex-marriage is not legal at all for Christian. God does not not permit homosexual. But for non Christian there is nothing problem with same sex-marriage.

  6. Steph - September 1, 2009 at 6:14 am

    I think its not fair that they have to be looked down upon because they are gay or lesbian

  7. kerst - September 13, 2009 at 11:48 pm

    Im sorry shane but everyone is entitled to their own rights. Love is Love and thats just the way it is, same sex marrige hurts no one and should NOT be a law, otherwise there should be no marriges at all, because one marries the other on be cause they love each other, does that mean that its not LOVE because its the same sex?? I believe every person has the right to marry who they want, (thats concensual and adult).

  8. flood pictures - November 20, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Just to add information from sulumits retsambew, in Islam same-sex marriage is not legal. Islam have story about it that happen when the age of Luth prophet.

  9. Babhyface - December 14, 2009 at 10:00 am

    I Think That Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Legalized Because Some People Dont Like The Oppsite Sex.Also Because You Should Not Interfer With Other Other`s life.

  10. annie gypsy hater - January 14, 2010 at 9:31 am

    the only people who should not get married are gypsys they creep me out.. they will try to take over the world with gypsy children

    GO GAYS!!!!

  11. la la la you will never get this! - January 14, 2010 at 9:36 am

    i agreeeeee with ANNIE gypsy hater…….. ya ya

  12. leelee - January 31, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    I think all those people that want to refer to the bible and say gays are wrong in Gods eyes need to keep reading because it also says no man shall pass judgement on the other or that one shouldnt lie rape kill. All these things happen everyday yet murders are allowed to wed or rapest. As a homosexual myself i would like to know what wrong im doing by god or man that is any greater than any other persons crime or sin. if i am said to be wrong by god by loving another as god says to love all then so be it and if we follow the laws of man to convict or restrict us from marriage we forget the true reson people wed. Love is what marriage is supposed to be about not rece sex or religion.

  13. John Kuriakose - March 9, 2010 at 11:30 am

    The question is not whether gay marriage is good or bad. Individuals have the freedom to be or not to be gays, to sin or not to sin. There, they become the masters of their own fate!However,they deserve sympathy, for they decide to be gays because of a psychological or biological disorder. The question to be addressed is this: for a country whose president takes oath of office on the Bible, is it legitimate to approve of sodomy? And how about the priest who sanctifies it? The former, like Fisher King, invites doom to the land, and the latter brings perdition to himself. No Christian can deny that God destroyed Sodom for this vice. The same is the fate of any country that legitimizes it.

  14. raychael mufuken d - March 24, 2010 at 5:22 am

    no one can help who they fall in love with, whether that person be of the opposite sex or the same sex. how would you like it if you were outlawed from marrying the person you want to spend the rest of your life with because people are selfish and don’t support in favor of others? love is love and should not be judged by anyone else but the people involved. go gayysss

  15. Naileen G. - April 14, 2010 at 11:39 am

    I am completely in favor of gay marriage. Of course this is a matter of sentiments and emotions, but if we get right down to it, this is a plain violation of American rights. Is it not illegal to descriminate against someone on the basis of religious beliefs? Then tell me, how is it legal to ban gay marriage? What arguement does the government have? ONLY RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. It is ILLEGAL. This is corruption of the government.

  16. Kathy T. - May 28, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    I support Marriage Equality because I believe it is a civil right not a religious issue. Jesus Christ could neither read nor write. The Bible was written by scholars of the day and said to be “inspired” by God. I believe that it was. It was/is an “interpretation” by a mortal man. I also think that those people who use the scriptures to justify their behavior and beliefs “conveniently” pick and choose scriptures. If not, then the Sabbath would be kept on Saturday, not Sunday and “Christians” would not lie, steal, murder or cheat on their spouses. Or create MEGA churches! The Scriptures clearly point out, “The Most High God does not dwell in buildings made with hands!” Biblical scripture was used by proponents of slavery and at a KKK ceremony you’ll find the American flag, a cross and the Bible; all justify their actions backed by particular scriptures. If you believe and follow the Scriptures, how do you interpret this passage? “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.”John 15:12 Are you one of the hyprocrite Christians? that add the words … as long as they are JUST LIKE ME!

  17. john - May 31, 2010 at 10:20 am

    look at it this way. animals follow their instinct. and their instinct is to mate with the opposite sex. plus a man and a man cant make a child because its unatural. I think gay marrage is wrong.

  18. babybreath - August 17, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    Ok this conflict will go on forever about people rights to choose, civil rights, human rights constitutional rights; its all the same. From the bible point of view God created man and woman and gave us the right to choose (free will) and in essence he also set out the standards for us to serve him and to live by or reap the consequences he has decided upon if we choose not to obey his laws. If the gays choose to disobey his commandment. They will reap the same reward as Sodom and Gommorah (THIS IS WHAT THEY CHOOSE). Yes Jeasus commanded all of us to love as we have loved him but we are not loving him if we are not obeying his commnandments (WE ARE USING ARE FREE WILL) That’s what gays and lesbian are doing so with that being said ( let them be doomed and the bible commands. And the Government is upholding the law only by Gods permission until His appointed time. HOMESEXUALITY IS LUST IN THE FLESH AND THEY WILL ALWAYS CONTEND WITH IT AS LONGER AS THEY DESIRE THE INCLINATIONS OF THE HEART. GOD IS NOT LISTENING OR ACCEPTING THEIR PRAYERS UNLESS THEY REPENT

  19. porcia - October 18, 2010 at 11:30 am

    hey everyone listen to me i beleive that gay marriage is wrong think of it this way why would a man put his —– in another mans —– if he can do that to a famale i really dont understand….

  20. Chris A. - October 21, 2010 at 7:18 pm

    To me i beleive everyone is entitled to there own opinions, however when they try to take action based off those opinions which limit the rights of certain people, is when i start getting a little ticked. I mean the reason why this has become such a big issue is because people just have to put there noses in where it does not belong. Let gay couples have what they want they are people just like everyone else, they cant help who they love and i think that its stupid that so many of them ar discrimiated and hated for it. I as a straight male, feel that it is none of our concern what they do, i mean what if it was your brother or sister who was in a gay relationship? What would you do then? Think about it before you go shooting your mouth off

  21. kathryn - January 6, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    i love gay people

  22. Your Mom - February 15, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    Hi!=)

  23. Your Mom - February 15, 2011 at 1:07 pm

    I like gay people, they’re friendly!=D

  24. Mickey. - March 4, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    Why ruin someones happiness? Society is so screwed up.

  25. wow - March 31, 2011 at 10:10 am

    just remerber that marrige is just papers and if you really love somone than you shouldt need papers to show it!

  26. doesnt matter - May 24, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    Okay for all those people who say that they are against gays I have something to say. If you think that it is so wrong for someone to love someone of the same sex then why dont you prove a point. All of you say the same thing!!! Why dont you guys stick your….in a guys… because its just the same thing as stickin it in a girl? So next time you try to argue that point you should probably just… not do it! And for all the guys that think girl on girl action is so hot … most of those girls are probably gay or bi sexual so think about that next time you touch yourself looking at girl on girl! bye

  27. Jennifer - May 25, 2011 at 11:59 am

    You know what? For those of you who say that Gay marriage is wrong…..IT’S NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUISNESS!!! You shouldn’t really care about what gay people do, it’s not your life. Does it really matter what they do for sex? No, not really. It’s their life! It’s not fair for them, I’m straight and I have the right to marry a guy, but most importantly marry with someone I love. And Gays don’t have the right marry who they love. Think about it people!!! We have the power, the right to marry and Gays don’t!! That’s just wrong! It’s very selfish to say that it’s wrong and that Gays should not get married. Very selfish. I support Gays, Lesbians, Homosexual, and Transgenders. They are human! We are all human!! We all should have the right!! Think about it!

  28. MARY R. MILLER - September 22, 2011 at 1:30 am

    WRONG, WRONG , WRONG. SAME SEX MARRIAGE IS ONE BAD MISTAKE. THE WOMAN AND MAN ARE THE LIFE SUPPORT FOR AMERICA AND OTHER COUNTRIES. BUILT ON BASIC PRINCIPLES THAT MAKE SINCE TO NATURE

  29. Aaron - October 10, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    How could you christians? I am a straight God fearing man. i see you supposed
    “christians” try to judge these people for love. I have walked by faith all my life and if you people cant understand God’s forgiving,redeeming love; how can you label yourselves as followers of Christ. Only throw the stone if you are without sin.
    @babybreath what makes you think their prayers wont get answered through jesus’ name we are all saved if we so choose regardless.gays don’t destroy the sanctity of marriage it’s the people who don’t love one another that do.

  30. Allie H - October 11, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    To be completely honest marriage is marriage and you do need those “papers” you would need them in any other case of straight marriage and why should we allow god to dictate what we think or believe for those people who do not believe in god which many homosexuals do not then why should they have to follow by what the bible says if there is free religion is this country just because what you think is morally incorrect doesn’t match what other people think is doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be a law

    here is what i think is wrong with religion the catholic church will hide and protect child molesters just to keep there name clear and why do we need multimillion dollar churches to pray in if we could pray in small old churches what is morally wrong that our country will let us head bang and listen to rap and hard metal but gays are immoral

    how about this a man was just recently arrested for not paying child support on his three kids which were all from different women but homosexuals shouldn’t adopt children even though they could be given better chances and a equal fight at life is that morally correct?

    and how about the fact that we will send homosexuals over seas to die for this country but we won’t let them get married or even say that they are proudly gay until now

    If you are injured in battle and you can’t move and someone that is gay runs out and saves your life by dragging you out of battle and letting you go home and see your family one more time is that person a criminal is that person morally incorrect, and remember that person just laid down his/her life for u! can u answer me that?

  31. Allie H - October 11, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    Dear MARY R MILLER

    Making since to nature? did you know that over 1500 animals in the animal kingdom practice homosexuality including some of the most popular animals including dwarf chimpanzees and even lions so put morals a side and think about what is natural or better yet YouTube it because animals in the NATURE are doing it and have been for a while so why can’t we?

  32. Lexyy - November 16, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    Lets just start of with, I’m a straight 17 year old girl who believes in same sex marriage very strongly.

    How is it fair to say it is not right. We live in America, which is based on freedom right? Freedom should say it all. If America is truly a free country, then why is same sex marriage such a big deal. Yes, i respect people who are Christian/ any other religion that doesn’t except it because they don’t want to disobey what they believe in. People who are not, have no right to be pointing their fingers. Everyone should be able to marry who they love. Does anyone even know what love’s definition is? If you dont. It is.

    *profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person.

    The two key words in the definition is another person. If the definition were to say passionate affection between a man and a women, it would be different. Love leads to marriage, and if someone loves someone the same sex then marriage should be an option.. but its not. Some people argue that it will have an affect on the legal system. To me, i think its all a bunch of b.s.. What I mean when I say this is that everyone who is married, gets special benefits. For example, social security benefits. Couples who are married, are somewhat considered as one. When one dies before the age of 70, the other gets their social security money that they have worked for their whole life. People who are not straight, and are together can’t have that same liability. I know people who live next door to me, who are going threw this as you read. They have been together for 14 years and don’t have the right to do as straights do. I also feel very strongly about this…

    It’s not your life, its theirs.
    Its not affecting you any..

    So why should it matter?
    Love does not equal out to anything more then what you feel.

  33. Sarah - December 21, 2011 at 9:20 pm

    I just don’t get what the big deal about gay marriage is. Don’t like gay marriages? Don’t get one. Think it’s against the bible? Don’t get one. Think it’s uncomfortable or wrong? THEN DON’T BE GAY. Letting gay people get married won’t make you less of a man/woman or less straight. They are JUST PEOPLE. Being gay doesn’t mean you are any different… why do people care what they do and who they do it with. Why do you want to spend your life taking away other people’s rights…? If you hate gay marriage so much, then don’t get one. Why it bothers people so much, I have no fricking idea.

  34. Kayla - January 5, 2012 at 9:26 am

    I hate the arguements, It shouldn’t even need to BE argued over! You christians treat gay people as if they aren’t human, and don’t deserve the right to be happy. Its ridiculous! If your ‘god’ was so forgiving and righteous, he wouldn’t hate someone just because of the gender they happen to like. ‘He’ created us all equal, did he not? Then we should TREAT them equally, and not try and ‘cure’ them like they have some kind of bloody illness that has to be treated.

  35. Joe - January 5, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    Many Christians don’t find anything wrong with letting two people of the same sex get married, some churches doing the honors. The others give the rest bad names.

  36. Val - January 19, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    LOVE is not about religion or equality…. it just happens! i might still be a teenager but i do understand. when people fall in love they don’t care what shape, size, color, or even gender they are. Plus it isn’t about what older people think.. it’s my generation that we are talking about… And I Do Accept gay marriage.. actually i’m not going to call it that, that’s rude. Lets Just say i Accept Their Decision of marrying the person they LOVE ..

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress