<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Judiciary Act: Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/2009_judiciary.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/2009_judiciary.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:31:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/2009_judiciary.html/comment-page-1#comment-44233</link>
		<dc:creator>A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/2009-judiciary-act-part-one.html#comment-44233</guid>
		<description>What a shock.  in a bid to change the judiciary to one less responsive to concepts like the constitution, these profs (excluding the author) don&#039;t seem to be terribly concerned with constitutional restraints (the actual author of this post excluded).

If anything we need to figure out how to make the judiciary less responsive to the people, not more.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shock.  in a bid to change the judiciary to one less responsive to concepts like the constitution, these profs (excluding the author) don&#8217;t seem to be terribly concerned with constitutional restraints (the actual author of this post excluded).</p>
<p>If anything we need to figure out how to make the judiciary less responsive to the people, not more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
