<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juicy Campus: One Down, Too Many More to Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BITCHSLAP JONES</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-66535</link>
		<dc:creator>BITCHSLAP JONES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/juicy-campus-one-down-too-many-more-to-go.html#comment-66535</guid>
		<description>The US Government is finally coming for people like Ed Magedson of the RipOff Report (www.ripoffreport.com), and all of their posters.

Plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Government is finally coming for people like Ed Magedson of the RipOff Report (www.ripoffreport.com), and all of their posters.</p>
<p>Plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-44688</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/juicy-campus-one-down-too-many-more-to-go.html#comment-44688</guid>
		<description>Congrats to Reputation Defender for their apparently-effective campus advocacy on this issue.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to Reputation Defender for their apparently-effective campus advocacy on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-44687</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/juicy-campus-one-down-too-many-more-to-go.html#comment-44687</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Prof. Citron. I look forward to reading it. I think the Roommates court&#039;s reasoning was a step in the right direction, but I&#039;m not sure other circuits will sign on and I don&#039;t think its reasoning could be used to deny a site like Juicy Campus section 230 immunity because I don&#039;t believe Juicy Campus &quot;contributes materially to the alleged illegality of the conduct&quot; such that it becomes a co-developer or co-creator of the objectionable content that students posted. I do think that several suits against MySpace pending in various state and federal appellate courts could herald some additional limits on 230&#039;s immunity carve-out, though, but we will have to wait and see.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Prof. Citron. I look forward to reading it. I think the Roommates court&#8217;s reasoning was a step in the right direction, but I&#8217;m not sure other circuits will sign on and I don&#8217;t think its reasoning could be used to deny a site like Juicy Campus section 230 immunity because I don&#8217;t believe Juicy Campus &#8220;contributes materially to the alleged illegality of the conduct&#8221; such that it becomes a co-developer or co-creator of the objectionable content that students posted. I do think that several suits against MySpace pending in various state and federal appellate courts could herald some additional limits on 230&#8217;s immunity carve-out, though, but we will have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle Citron</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-44686</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Citron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/juicy-campus-one-down-too-many-more-to-go.html#comment-44686</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughtful comment, Matt.  I agree.  (I have an article coming out soon in the BU Law Review entitled Cyber Civil Rights in which I explore that suggestion and others to ensure that website operators exercise reasonable care given the aspirations of CDA, which, as you wisely note, was self-policing; I would love your comments on the piece.  And Dan Solove has an interesting comment in yesterday&#039;s Higher Ed article on Juicy Campus&#039;s closing that you might want to check out: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/02/05/juicy

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughtful comment, Matt.  I agree.  (I have an article coming out soon in the BU Law Review entitled Cyber Civil Rights in which I explore that suggestion and others to ensure that website operators exercise reasonable care given the aspirations of CDA, which, as you wisely note, was self-policing; I would love your comments on the piece.  And Dan Solove has an interesting comment in yesterday&#8217;s Higher Ed article on Juicy Campus&#8217;s closing that you might want to check out: <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/02/05/juicy" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/02/05/juicy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/juicy_campus_on.html/comment-page-1#comment-44685</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/juicy-campus-one-down-too-many-more-to-go.html#comment-44685</guid>
		<description>It will take Congress amending section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to expressly provide that websites cannot use its immunity carve-out as a shield unless they self-police content in line with the policy goals of the statute.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will take Congress amending section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to expressly provide that websites cannot use its immunity carve-out as a shield unless they self-police content in line with the policy goals of the statute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
