Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Alice on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Rachel Karash on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • feathered_head on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Concernicus on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Ian on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Peterk on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Robert on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Three Oranges on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Paul Robichaux on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • JR on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Jan on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Mark on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Is the Window Open? February Law Review Submission Season Notice Board

posted by Dave Hoffman

[Bumped x2.]

A few weeks back, Matt Bodie put up a thread on the winter law review submission season at Prawfs. It didn’t get too many responses, suggesting to me that the season hadn’t yet arrived. Time having passed, I’m putting this post up to inquire of our student law review readers:

1. Has your board turned over?

2. If not, when will it?

3. Do you want new articles on the day the new board moves in, or would you prefer to get used to the new digs first?

4. If you have already turned over, are you planning any theme issues that folks ought to consider submitting specialized pieces for?

5. What format do you want pieces in (especially if you are changing your previous policies).

6. Do you (still) take cash?

I will bump this thread weekly.


 February 23, 2009 at 10:52 pm   Posted in: Law School (Law Reviews)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (20)

  1. Illinois Editor - February 5, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    1. We elected our new board on Tuesday.

    3. Articles can come in pretty much any time now. Probably starting next week would be best.

    4. We generally don’t do theme issues (unless it’s a symposium issue, of course)

    5-6: We haven’t changed any policy.

  2. Minnesota - February 5, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Information on our submissions page.

    1. No.

    2. Saturday.

    3. February 18.

    4. Symposium is our only theme issue, and we solicit pieces for that.

    5. MS Word document submitted via ExpressO.

    6. Sure, why not?

  3. Ex-Editors - February 5, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    Dear Mr. Hoffman,

    *Now* you bring up cash? Why weren’t you willing to offer us cash last time you submitted? Instead, you told us that shares in the Madoff Fund were better, far, far better, than cash. And busy law review editors (and professor-trusting 2Ls) that we were, we accepted your representations. (We even worked hard on the source check.)

    Well, David-dude, please delete that article from your c.v. We’ve already deleted it from Westlaw and Hein. Cash is king around here now.

    - Your ex-editors

  4. david hoffman - February 5, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Look, you clearly got the prospectus (the “Cover Letter”) which accompanied my last piece. That prospectus contained the usual mix of puffery & safe-harbor statements, and put you on pretty fair notice about the securities in question.

    (In the meantime, current editors, please ignore this nonsense and try to provide some information that would help us poor authors know which way the wind blows.)

  5. Yale Journal of International Law (YJIL) - February 5, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    1. No.

    2. Officers in late February, full Board in early March.

    3. Submissions re-open March 1, 2009.

    4. No theme issues are expected for our next volume (Volume 35).

    5. .doc or .pdf format via ExpressO.

    Thanks, and we look forward to reading your submissions!

  6. William & Mary L. Rev. Member - February 6, 2009 at 8:07 am

    1. No.

    2. The new board will be elected Sunday, Feb. 22.

    3. The new articles committee will likely start reading the week of Feb. 22.

    4. We have an annual symposium, but I am not sure of its topic.

    5. We accept via ExpressO.

    6. In this economy, we prefer gold bullion, a change from our prior policies.

  7. Vanderbilt Law Review - February 6, 2009 at 10:27 am

    1. No.

    2. The new board will be selected on Saturday, February 14.

    3. We are resuming submission review on Wednesday, February 18 in order to have a few days to train the new Senior Articles Editor and Articles Committee on the submissions process.

    4. We have no theme issues planned for the 2009-2010 editorial term. Next year’s editorial board will not be publishing a symposium.

    4.5. However, Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc, our new online companion, continues to accept submissions of shorter, lightly footnoted responses to articles published in the Vanderbilt Law Review. Please visit our website for more details: http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/index.aspx

    5. We strongly prefer electronic submissions through ExpressO. We ask that authors not submit both hard and electronic copies. If you do not have access to an ExpressO account, please send your article, an abstract, and a CV to articles.review@law.vanderbilt.edu. For more information on our submission policies, please see our website: http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/submissions/index.aspx

    6. We do not accept cash. But we do accept chocolate, coffee, and any other sources of caffeine. Mostly we just look forward to receiving your submissions!

    Thanks!

    Lauren Lowe

    Senior Articles Editor

  8. Anthony Vitarelli - February 6, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    YLJ turns over on 2/15. The new articles committee will immediately begin reviewing submissions.

  9. Michigan Law Review - February 6, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    1. Yes

    2. N/A

    3. We are up and running now and welcome submissions.

    4. We are planning no theme issues other than our annual Book Review issue. We will not be having a symposium this year.

    5. We accept submissions in .doc or .pdf form via ExpressO.

  10. Michigan Law Review Book Review - February 6, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    A couple of additional points for authors wishing to contribute to the Michigan Law Review’s annual Book Review Issue:

    -We are currently accepting submissions for the Book Review Issue. However, submissions to the Book Review Issue should be emailed directly to michlrev.ed.br@umich.edu, and should not be submitted via ExpressO.

    -We are accepting manuscripts and short draft sections, as well as 1-2 page proposals for book reviews. Please see our complete guidelines for Book Review proposals at

    http://www.michiganlawreview.org/submit/propform.pdf.

  11. Elon Law Review - February 6, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    Elon Law Review is currently accepting submissions of articles and book reviews. Submissions in .doc format may be sent by email to Ashley Duncan, Articles Editor (jduncan8@elon.edu ) or Neil Oakley, Book Review Editor (noakley@elon.edu ). We expect to begin accepting submissions through ExpressO shortly.

  12. Emory Law Journal - February 7, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    1. No

    2. Feb. 25

    3. We will begin reviewing submissions immediately after our elections.

    4. We are planning no theme issues other than our symposium issue.

    5. We accept submissions via ExpressO.

  13. dave hoffman - February 17, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    I’ve learned that the Cornell Law Review just elected their board and that they are accepting submissions.

  14. George Washington Law Review - February 17, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    1. The board has not yet turned over.

    2. Officially, new editors begin on March 16th; until then, old and new editors will be working side-by-side.

    3. Articles are welcome now.

    4. We have an Annual Review of Administrative Law. No other issue (other than our symposium issue) has a set theme.

    5. Please send pieces in .doc or .pdf to gwlrarticles@law.gwu.edu, or submit via ExpressO. No hard copy required.

    6. No traveler’s checks.

  15. California Law Review - February 18, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    1. Yes.

    2. See #1.

    3. We are accepting articles now.

    4. We have a theme issue but we are planning for it separately.

    5. We prefer submissions via ExpressO in Word 2003 or PDF format. Word 2007 is acceptable.

    6. We prefer articles of 20K to 30K words (including footnotes). 35K is acceptable. >35K under extraordinary circumstances.

  16. SMU Law Review - February 24, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    1. No.

    2. Our elections are next week and turnover will officially occur on April 1st.

    3. We are currently reviewing articles and will continue accepting submissions after turnover.

    4. We are organizing a symposium, but there is nothing firm yet.

    5. We prefer submissions made through ExpressO.

    6. Kind words are always accepted.

  17. Iowa Law Review - February 25, 2009 at 9:52 am

    1. The new Board has not been selected.

    2. March 9.

    3. Feel free to submit articles now. The outgoing Articles Editors are reviewing articles to recommend to the incoming Editors.

    4. N/A

    5. We prefer that authors submit their articles via ExpressO, but we also accept hard copies. We no longer accept email submissions.

  18. North Carolina Law Review - February 25, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    1. Yes.

    2. We elected our new Board on February 22nd.

    3. We will resume submission review within the week, so please begin submitting your articles if you have not already.

    4. This year’s fall symposium is entitled “Globalization, Families, and the State,” and the Law Review will be publish pieces authored by the symposium presenters.

    5. We strongly prefer submissions via ExpressO, though you are always free to send us hard copy submissions.

    6. Our preferred form of payment is candy – thank you!

  19. Missouri Law Review - February 26, 2009 at 10:43 am

    1. We are transitioning

    2. Articles editors take over March 1st

    3. Feel free to submit at any time

    4. Next spring’s symposium topic has not been selected

    5. We strongly prefer submissions via ExpressO, though all submissions will receive the same review.

  20. anon - March 8, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Harvard has obviously been accepting for a while, since mid-Feb.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress