Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Whatever happened to Henry Simons? (fp)

Wow -- that's some very scary poll results (kw)

The scarlet ankle bracelet. (fp)

Every good article should have one idea. (fp)

Family values in market turnover culture. (fp)

Banks really create value: probably $58 billion in overdraft fees & credit card penalties in 2009. (fp)

A Citizens United dream: Exxon could have deployed 10% of its 2008 profits to outspend every presidential and senatorial candidate that year. (fp)

Eternal Earth-Bound Pets promises to adopt your pet if you are raptured. (fp)

Habermas doesn't tweet, but does interview well. (fp)

Lessig on Google, copyright, orphans, and the future of access to information. (kw)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Kristina on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open?

    • PrometheeFeu on The Advantages and Disadvantages of Rewards

    • PoNyman on Very scary poll results

    • Civ Pro King on Privacy Rights in Death Photos: Catsuouras Case Decided

    • ParatrooperJJ on Privacy Rights in Death Photos: Catsuouras Case Decided

    • Lotta on The Take Away About Take Home Exams

    • Alan on Constitutional Rorschach Test (or Zen Koan)

    • Colin Crowe on The Take Away About Take Home Exams

    • Glomarization on Links and short thoughts on Amazonfail

    • Vinca on Book Review: Divergent Opinions: Why Community Matters — A Review of Sunstein’s Going to Extremes

    • A.J. Sutter on My Letter to the Economist on Climate Change

    • Keri Brooks on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open?

    • Illinois on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open?

    • Ken Rhodes on Constitutional Rorschach Test (or Zen Koan)

    • Ken Rhodes on My Letter to the Economist on Climate Change

  •  

    Site Meter

FreeCreditReport.com Spoof Song

posted by Daniel Solove

I’ve blogged in the past about FreeCreditReport.com and the fact that I think it ought to be shut down. This is one of the rather obnoxious attempts by the credit reporting agencies to exploit people’s fears of identity theft as a tool to generate money.

FreeCreditReport.com is not free. You can get your free credit report at the official site, AnnualCreditReport.com.

Here’s a terrific spoof of a FreeCreditReport.com commercial. These commercials appear all over cable TV with jingles about how people’s lives were ruined by identity theft or bad credit and how all their woes could have been averted if they only used FreeCreditReport.com:

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) requires that credit reporting agencies “follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.” 15 U.S.C. § 1681 e(b). If services like FreeCreditReport.com are really necessary to protect oneself from inaccuracies, then why wouldn’t these be required by the FCRA for free? If such services are unnecessary, then the advertisements are doubly false — trying to sell consumers a “free” service that’s not really free plus selling a service as essential and necessary yet that’s unnecessary.

As I wrote in my previous post:

The other irony is this: It is the practices of the credit reporting agencies that have put many consumers at risk for identity theft. Now, they are selling consumers protection from a problem that is at least in part their own making. It reminds me of the scene in The Godfather Part II, where the mob would rob and pillage people’s stores and then offer security protection for a fee.

Hat tip: BoingBoing


 February 22, 2009 at 2:37 pm   Posted in: Humor, Privacy, Privacy (Consumer Privacy)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Don - February 23, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    the commercials are hilarious although the service is not free and they get you with monthly payments. They always have a funny angle though.

  2. A - February 24, 2009 at 11:21 am

    The FTC went after Experian for this a couple of years ago. I guess it’s time to try again, or at least look into how or why companies can use the word “free” to advertise a fee-based product, as long as the fee is properly disclosed.

    http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/02/cic.shtm

  3. Boyd - February 24, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Esperian really is slime. Another angle they have developed is to phone businesses with telemarketing calls. It really is them as the caller ID does indeed show their phone number as listed on their web site. They called me every day (didn’t answer after the first time) insisting that they are “just verifying your business information”. When pressed the caller admitted that what they are really doing is collecting your information for telemarketing lists that they can sell. Like I said – slime.

  4. Anon E. Moose - February 24, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    The commercials are nonsense. Catchy jingle, perhaps, but nonsense nonetheless.

    In one the protagonist has to take a job as a waiter in a heavily themed restaurant because of a bad credit report – aside, what’s wrong with that? I know that some employers use credit checks as part of the screening process, but if INCORRECT information tips the balance against you, there were other problems to begin with. As noted, problems suach as INCORRECT information are of the CRA’s making, not the individual’s. If the information is correct, then the service can’t help.

    In another, the protagonist buys an undesirable car because of being denied for a loan due to INCORRECT information. Has this ever happened in the history of mankind? “I’m sorry sir, you don’t qualify to borrow the money necessary to buy the car you want because of negative credit information.” The response should be – WTF?!? not ‘OK, then just put me in that old overpriced beater instead. Can I get my first three tows for free?’

    I can hardly beleive I spent this much time complaining about it.

  5. ATREV - May 12, 2009 at 9:56 am

    damn i agree with daniel, free credit report .com is a scam and it should be shut down, all it is is catchy jingles and funny lines that put the name of the company into you head, which is a very effective form of subliminal messageing

    it should be shut down for at least wasteing peoples time, but it can’t be and won’t be…

  6. Deeper Voice - July 20, 2009 at 9:32 pm

    When pressed the caller admitted that what they are really doing is collecting your information for telemarketing lists that they can sell

  7. BEAT MAKER - January 5, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    As noted, problems suach as INCORRECT information are of the CRA’s making, not the individual’s. If the information is correct, then the service can’t help.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Adam Benforado
Mark Edwards
Michelle Harner
Kristin Johnson
Jeffrey Kahn
Alex Kreit
Viva Moffat
Adam Steinman










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress