Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


New Supreme Court website (DJS)

A digital-age bird man for Alcatraz?  Tweeting oneself to jail. (DJS)

NYT: How privacy vanishes online (DJS)

Orin Kerr critiques the 11th Circuit on email and the Fourth Amendment (DJS)

Identification by your germs (DJS)

Interview of Professor William Stuntz (DJS)

Professor Eric Goldman on the proposed federal Anti-SLAPP Bill (DJS)

Important advice for new profs: DO NOT make jokes (online or otherwise) about killing your students. (kw)

FTC Report: ID theft is down but overall fraud is up (DJS)

Balkin on reconciliation vs. filibuster (DJS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Geoff Garver on A Civil Procedure Curriculum Challenge

    • David Adams on Deem and Pass

    • edi juandi on Network News Gives Up

    • Gerard Magliocca on Deem and Pass

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Robert Scott Lawrence on Thoughts about choosing law school, part 4

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Test Executive Pay by Contract Law, not Delaware Corporate Law

    • relatively new on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Mark S. Devenow on My Bad!: The Supreme Court’s Assault on Judicial Elections

    • AF on Deem and Pass

    • another anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • NotAProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

  •  

    Site Meter

Law Profs Abroad: Astronauts or Nomads?

posted by Shruti Rana

The advent of wireless, social networking, and shrinking electronics is, to my delight, moving us ever closer to the day when anyone can be a modern-day “urban nomad.” According to this Economist article, urban nomads, like “their antecedents in the desert, [] are defined not by what they carry but by what they leave behind, knowing that the environment will provide it. Thus, Bedouins do not carry their own water, because they know where the oases are. Modern nomads carry almost no paper because they access their documents on their laptop computers, mobile phones or online.”

But as I began my visiting position in Beijing, my Bedouin hopes were dashed by an unexpected drag – the pile of textbooks I needed for the classes I was wrapping up in Maryland and the ones I was to teach in China. Thus, my need for books and paper rendered me not a nomad but an “astronaut.” Textbook-laden law professors are much like the astronauts who “must bring what they need, including oxygen, because they cannot rely on their environment to provide it,” leaving them “both defined and limited by their gear and supplies.” Books are my oxygen, and to me, symbolize the intellectual freedom of academia. But now, during this trip, they began to limit me as well, adding to the practical, linguistic, social and cultural obstacles between me and my students in both Maryland and China. Ultimately, the heavy book-filled bag I had to check in forced me think about the deeper implications of urban nomadism, and of course, what this could mean to law professors.

The key to urban nomadism is not, as I initially thought, about travel and a zero-drag lifestyle. It is both

different from, and involves much more than, merely making journeys. A modern nomad is as likely to be a teenager in Oslo, Tokyo or suburban America as a jet-setting chief executive. He or she may have never left his or her city, stepped into an aeroplane or changed address. Indeed, how far he moves is completely irrelevant. Even if an urban nomad confines himself to a small perimeter, he nonetheless has a new and surprisingly different relationship to time, to place and to other people.

The nomads now emerging around the world are different from those of the past because of their constant connectivity, not motion, and the implications of this are still unfolding.

So naturally my next thought was: could I, as a law professor, shed the gear that sustains yet limits me? And what would this feel like?


I decided (and was partly compelled by circumstance) to limit my reliance on textbooks and paper in search of challenge, freedom, and a different type of interaction with my students. And, given the exigencies of life in Beijing, I thought it best to do so quickly and cleanly, like a Band-Aid that’s outlived its purpose. Printers, copiers, faxes and other relics from the age of landlines can be difficult to find (and good luck finding ones that actually work at the moment you need them). Luckily, wireless abounds in Beijing (though generally for those who can pay for it). Like many rapidly developing cities I’ve seen, it maintains a dichotomous relationship with technology; only a slice of the population is connected, but whether because of practicalities or adventurousness of spirit, that slice has embraced wireless and other technology far more passionately and thoroughly than its American counterpart.

About halfway through my trip, I largely abandoned textbooks and paper in favor of freely available online sources, and increasingly began communicating with my students in both Beijing and Maryland via email and Blackboard (and even attempted to conduct an extra review session entirely through email). As a true nomad would have predicted, the real revelation of this transition was not enhanced mobility, but rather, enhanced connectivity and the corresponding impact this had on my teaching and experience abroad.

Perhaps none of this is a surprise to my students (or the already tech-savvy), but I found that in many ways I was able to connect with my students more easily and substantively electronically as opposed to in the classroom. Class participation became broader and deeper; nearly all of my Maryland students started (and kept) emailing me, including some who rarely, if ever, came to office hours or spoke up in class. And their questions and comments grew increasingly more detailed and thoughtful; in fact, many of their finely crafted questions and hypotheticals would have made great exam questions. In China, email helped me and my students leap over language and social issues—students who were hesitant to engage in relatively unfamiliar Socratic-style dialogue in class jumped at the chance to do so over email, and many were more comfortable typing out their questions or comments. I also (generally) enjoyed and tried to constructively apply the instant feedback I received. And both sets of students helped enhance my cultural connections by emailing me tips on places to visit or things to try in China, as well as keeping me up-to-date on everything from study-group progress to blow-by-blow bailout news and reactions in the U.S. My only regret is that I didn’t connect my students in Baltimore and Beijing more directly, instead of using myself as a filter and conduit for their questions and comments for each other. Blogging, too, has proved to be a terrific way to connect with fascinating people (some, it turns out, in the same city) whom I’d never have met otherwise.

Despite this fascinating experience, I can’t yet teach an entire course without books or even paper, so as a law professor I’m still largely an astronaut abroad or at home. But now I long for the day, hopefully not too far away, when I can load up all my textbooks onto my ipod and move from intellectual oasis to oasis. Or even better, simply place all the texts I need online where I can include all the links and comments I want, and watch and join into the dialogue developing between my students, and perhaps some of the wider world, too.


 December 20, 2008 at 2:26 pm   Posted in: Blogging   Print This Post Print This Post

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Lisa Fairfax
Michelle Harner
Sherrilyn Ifill
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Tuan Samahon
Alfred Yen










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Adam Benforado
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress