Comments on: Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 61, Number 6 (November 2008)

By: Another Law Prof

Another Law Prof — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:38:18 +0000

This error was no Tulane-level error!

By: Scott Goldman, Editor in Chief, Vanderbilt Law Review

Scott Goldman, Editor in Chief, Vanderbilt Law Review — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:29:33 +0000

Roe v. Wade was indeed a 7-2 decision. The Vanderbilt Law Review thanks this reader for his or her careful attention. We have corrected this error for the print edition and in our online PDFs. This error is entirely our own, and we apologize to Professors George and Guthrie for displaying the Justice count incorrectly as 6-3 on page 1843.

By: Anonymous Law Prof

Anonymous Law Prof — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:09:29 +0000

On page 1843 of their fascinating essay, George and Guthrie refer to Roe v. Wade as a 6-3 decision. But at page 1828 n. 13, they describe Roe v. Wade as a 7-2 decision. Normally, I would argue that such a minor error is not even worth mentioning, but it takes on more importance given their particular proposal and analysis.