<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theories of the Fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html/comment-page-1#comment-45943</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/theories-of-the-fall.html#comment-45943</guid>
		<description>somebody needs to watch the colbert xmas special:

&quot;Guest star Toby Keith, toting an assault rifle, sings an original song about making &quot;War on Christmas&quot; that supposedly denounces the forced secularization of the holiday, but is also decorated with such sights as Christmas-tree bombs falling from Santa&#039;s airplane and a smiley face painted on a nuclear mushroom cloud.&quot;

and hear the song &quot;Can I Interest You in Hannukah?&quot;

from

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/21/AR2008112103579.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somebody needs to watch the colbert xmas special:</p>
<p>&#8220;Guest star Toby Keith, toting an assault rifle, sings an original song about making &#8220;War on Christmas&#8221; that supposedly denounces the forced secularization of the holiday, but is also decorated with such sights as Christmas-tree bombs falling from Santa&#8217;s airplane and a smiley face painted on a nuclear mushroom cloud.&#8221;</p>
<p>and hear the song &#8220;Can I Interest You in Hannukah?&#8221;</p>
<p>from</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/21/AR2008112103579.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/21/AR2008112103579.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Boyden</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html/comment-page-1#comment-45942</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Boyden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/theories-of-the-fall.html#comment-45942</guid>
		<description>Two words: In. Sane.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: In. Sane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html/comment-page-1#comment-45941</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/theories-of-the-fall.html#comment-45941</guid>
		<description>I suppose that no one rational is surprised to see silliness on the Wall Street Journal editorial page but we should be even less surprised to see this bit of nonsense since, as they say, &quot;truth is the first casualty of war against Christmas.&quot;  (The fact that the last bit is often left out is just further evidence of the cunning of the anti-Christmas forces, I&#039;d think.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that no one rational is surprised to see silliness on the Wall Street Journal editorial page but we should be even less surprised to see this bit of nonsense since, as they say, &#8220;truth is the first casualty of war against Christmas.&#8221;  (The fact that the last bit is often left out is just further evidence of the cunning of the anti-Christmas forces, I&#8217;d think.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh James</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/theories_of_the.html/comment-page-1#comment-45940</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/theories-of-the-fall.html#comment-45940</guid>
		<description>Hilarious!  Anyone that thinks non-market forces are the impetus for saying, &quot;Happy Holidays&quot; in stead of, &quot;Merry Christmas&quot; is deluding themselves.  No one in this or previous markets when the trend started wanted to offend potential customers,and, much more importantly, say &quot;Happy Holidays&quot; extends the buying season.  You can start chiming in &quot;Happy Holidays&quot; right after Halloween now, even before in some stores&quot; and folks don&#039;t bat an eye.  &quot;Merry Christmas&quot; in early November?  Not so much.  Retailers know, and I&#039;m too guilty having worked in retail many years,  that holidays make people buy more.  Limiting yourself to Christmas constrains the time frame; being more generic means folks can hear the holiday blitz earlier and hopefully begin buying sooner and more prolifically.

It&#039;s got nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the market.  For a counterfactual imagine the market for a chain to advertise, &quot;We say &#039;Merry Christmas&#039;!&quot;  Certainly folks would do it if they saw it as being to their advantage, yet no major retailer has made this move.  Maybe they&#039;re missing something, but I think they&#039;re sticking with &quot;Happy Holidays&quot; for the reasons outlined above.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious!  Anyone that thinks non-market forces are the impetus for saying, &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; in stead of, &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221; is deluding themselves.  No one in this or previous markets when the trend started wanted to offend potential customers,and, much more importantly, say &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; extends the buying season.  You can start chiming in &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; right after Halloween now, even before in some stores&#8221; and folks don&#8217;t bat an eye.  &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221; in early November?  Not so much.  Retailers know, and I&#8217;m too guilty having worked in retail many years,  that holidays make people buy more.  Limiting yourself to Christmas constrains the time frame; being more generic means folks can hear the holiday blitz earlier and hopefully begin buying sooner and more prolifically.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the market.  For a counterfactual imagine the market for a chain to advertise, &#8220;We say &#8216;Merry Christmas&#8217;!&#8221;  Certainly folks would do it if they saw it as being to their advantage, yet no major retailer has made this move.  Maybe they&#8217;re missing something, but I think they&#8217;re sticking with &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; for the reasons outlined above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
