<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/open_source_cen_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/open_source_cen_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moz</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/open_source_cen_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-46125</link>
		<dc:creator>Moz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/open-source-censorship.html#comment-46125</guid>
		<description>My experience of censorship debates is that there will be a vocal minority in favour of the most draconian censorship (viz &quot;anything I don&#039;t like&quot;). Some of those people have a lot of time on their hands and are usually the sort of people who will happily send dozens of messages a day. One per site, per day until it&#039;s removed in all likelihood.

So 1200 messages/day might mean that there are as few as 20 people participating. Perhaps even fewer if a religious organisation or two have official efforts (paid or volunteer).

It could also be a single individual with a clue.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience of censorship debates is that there will be a vocal minority in favour of the most draconian censorship (viz &#8220;anything I don&#8217;t like&#8221;). Some of those people have a lot of time on their hands and are usually the sort of people who will happily send dozens of messages a day. One per site, per day until it&#8217;s removed in all likelihood.</p>
<p>So 1200 messages/day might mean that there are as few as 20 people participating. Perhaps even fewer if a religious organisation or two have official efforts (paid or volunteer).</p>
<p>It could also be a single individual with a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mazzone</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/open_source_cen_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-46124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mazzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/open-source-censorship.html#comment-46124</guid>
		<description>My colleague Derek Bambauer recently posted at SSRN a draft of an article which provides a very interesting set of metrics for assessing different forms of filtering and censorship. One of Derek&#039;s areas of interest is the degree of citizen participation in decisions to filter and he discusses the case of Saudi Arabia. The article is here:

Derek Bambauer, Guiding the Censor&#039;s Scissors: Assessing Internet Filtering,

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1143582

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My colleague Derek Bambauer recently posted at SSRN a draft of an article which provides a very interesting set of metrics for assessing different forms of filtering and censorship. One of Derek&#8217;s areas of interest is the degree of citizen participation in decisions to filter and he discusses the case of Saudi Arabia. The article is here:</p>
<p>Derek Bambauer, Guiding the Censor&#8217;s Scissors: Assessing Internet Filtering,</p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1143582" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1143582</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

