No Order Without Law Online

Dave Hoffman

Dave Hoffman is the Murray Shusterman Professor of Transactional and Business Law at Temple Law School. He specializes in law and psychology, contracts, and quantitative analysis of civil procedure. He currently teaches contracts, civil procedure, corporations, and law and economics.

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. Frank says:

    I agree, it’s a major problem. Jonathan Zittrain has been predicting the possibility of a massive uptick for a while now, but some critics of his at the Boston Review symposium on his book claim that the threat is overstated. Here’s the always provocative Richard Stallman:

    “Zombie machines are a problem, but not a catastrophe. Moreover, far from panicking, most users ignore the issue. Today, people are indeed concerned about the danger of phishing (mail and web pages that solicit personal information for fraud), but using a browsing-only device instead of a general computer won’t protect you from that.”

    ***

    “It is true that a general computer lets you run programs designed to spy on you, restrict you, or even let the developer attack you. Such programs include KaZaA, RealPlayer, Adobe Flash, Windows Media Player, Microsoft Windows, and MacOS. Windows Vista does all three of those things; it also lets Microsoft change the software without asking, or command it to permanently cease normal functioning.

    But restricted computers are no help, because they have the same problem, for the same reason.

    The iPhone is designed for remote attack by Apple. ”

    from

    http://www.bostonreview.net/BR33.2/stallman.php

  2. Adam says:

    Hi Dave,

    Speaking as a security expert, I’m not sure that this is a great use of the state’s power, especially absent a proposal of how the state’s power is going to be used.

    Regardless of the power, does it make more sense to track down DDoS attackers or muggers? The effort to conduct a multi-country investigation is much higher than the effort to arrest muggers, and the payoff seems lower.

    Then there’s the question of how to employ state power. Will everyone be required to run state-approved anti-malware software? Register their IP address and close down open wifi? Massive data retention and tracking?

    Finally, there’s the question of which state we’re discussing. I live in Washington State, and am currently in Spain. Should I have to install something at the border? When I enter the US?

    Speaking only for myself,

    Adam

  3. Bruce Boyden says:

    Re: the Stallman article, it strikes me as a pretty paranoid view to categorize all software updates as “remote attacks.” Technology is increasingly interconnected, like it or not. The botnet problem is the result of the lack of expertise or time at many of the nodes. Automatic updates are part of the solution, not the problem, unless your solution is that everyone should disconnect.

  4. Why should the state get involved? This is something that people can pretty much handle on their own. Should the state go to work for me every day and do my job for me? It’s important to have law professors and law students, but should the state take over law schools and run them?

    There’s no reason private entities can’t handle this just as effectively as a state could hope to, through creating better technologies and better security.

    How exactly do you propose that President Obama take on “zombie computers”?