<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do We Owe Future Generations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/what_do_we_owe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/what_do_we_owe.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/what_do_we_owe.html/comment-page-1#comment-46600</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/what-do-we-owe-future-generations.html#comment-46600</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;s a great topic.  I&#039;m skeptical of many of these very long term projections, because they should influence policy routinely in *all* areas before they revolutionize one particular area.

For example, property-rights advocates will warn darkly of a loss of innovation if we make even the slightest downward adjustment in patent or copyright rights/terms.  Yet the same folks often discount future environmental harm quite aggressively.  It&#039;s conservation for thee, but not for me.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s a great topic.  I&#8217;m skeptical of many of these very long term projections, because they should influence policy routinely in *all* areas before they revolutionize one particular area.</p>
<p>For example, property-rights advocates will warn darkly of a loss of innovation if we make even the slightest downward adjustment in patent or copyright rights/terms.  Yet the same folks often discount future environmental harm quite aggressively.  It&#8217;s conservation for thee, but not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/what_do_we_owe.html/comment-page-1#comment-46599</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/what-do-we-owe-future-generations.html#comment-46599</guid>
		<description>This is a great topic and the symposium looks fabulous.  One other way of looking at this is historically--did previous generations owe us anything?  There&#039;s a lot of writing by people who look back on previous generations and complain about the problems &quot;entailed&quot; upon them by previous generations.  And one can certainly ask about how we dealing with negligence or malfeasance of past generations.  I look forward to reading the papers from the symposium.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great topic and the symposium looks fabulous.  One other way of looking at this is historically&#8211;did previous generations owe us anything?  There&#8217;s a lot of writing by people who look back on previous generations and complain about the problems &#8220;entailed&#8221; upon them by previous generations.  And one can certainly ask about how we dealing with negligence or malfeasance of past generations.  I look forward to reading the papers from the symposium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

