<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bailout and the Hero Politician</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/the_bailout_and.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/the_bailout_and.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PForm</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/the_bailout_and.html/comment-page-1#comment-46909</link>
		<dc:creator>PForm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/the-bailout-and-the-hero-politician.html#comment-46909</guid>
		<description>One quibble: the change Bloomberg seeks would not apply prospectively, but only to incumbents. The NYT article you link to reports: &quot;His staff is envisioning an unusual bill that would apply only to those currently in office, allowing them to serve three terms instead of two. A permanent change would require voter approval, these people said.&quot;

That, I think, makes the change markedly more troublesome than would otherwise be the case.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One quibble: the change Bloomberg seeks would not apply prospectively, but only to incumbents. The NYT article you link to reports: &#8220;His staff is envisioning an unusual bill that would apply only to those currently in office, allowing them to serve three terms instead of two. A permanent change would require voter approval, these people said.&#8221;</p>
<p>That, I think, makes the change markedly more troublesome than would otherwise be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
