<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secrecy in Voting (But Not the Good Kind)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/secrecy_in_voti_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/secrecy_in_voti_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle Citron</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/secrecy_in_voti_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-46885</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Citron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/secrecy-in-voting-but-not-the-good-kind.html#comment-46885</guid>
		<description>Thanks Frank and my fellow Marylander for your comments.  The secrecy to which I refer is the privacy of our ballots.  That is the secrecy to which I refer and which is fundamentally important.  Thanks for the question!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Frank and my fellow Marylander for your comments.  The secrecy to which I refer is the privacy of our ballots.  That is the secrecy to which I refer and which is fundamentally important.  Thanks for the question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/secrecy_in_voti_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-46884</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/secrecy-in-voting-but-not-the-good-kind.html#comment-46884</guid>
		<description>&quot;Secrecy in Voting (But Not the Good Kind)&quot;

There&#039;s a good kind of secrecy in voting? But after listening to the left wax lyrical about the Orwellian-named &quot;Employee Free Choice Act&quot;, I thought...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Secrecy in Voting (But Not the Good Kind)&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a good kind of secrecy in voting? But after listening to the left wax lyrical about the Orwellian-named &#8220;Employee Free Choice Act&#8221;, I thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/secrecy_in_voti_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-46883</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/secrecy-in-voting-but-not-the-good-kind.html#comment-46883</guid>
		<description>This is a truly shocking outcome. . . . especially given repeated concerns about the validity of e-elections.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a truly shocking outcome. . . . especially given repeated concerns about the validity of e-elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

